John Mullane

And I don't think we're using, I don't think, like, we're looking, we're homing in on him going short-field from the back and he's shot-stopping.

But I don't think we're using his biggest asset.

And his biggest asset is, lads, he can go the full length of the pitch.

And that was the question I was asking in the first half.

What if it had the elements behind him?

And any time Billy Nolan went long into Stephen Bennett, Desi Hodgson, Sean Munch...

Sean Walsh and Cian Lyons we got an enormous amount of joy and then we reverted back and maybe this is just me being the old

the old traditionalists and saying, well, you know, and I fully understand that, you know, there has to be that mix of going short and going long.

But for me, I don't think we're using Billy Nolan's puck out.

Billy Nolan's bombs.

Bombs.

Bombs for all the world.

And I think, you know, I think we made a big mistake, monumental mistake in the first half.

When we went long with Billy Nolan, we got an enormous amount of joy.

And then when we were getting joy, then we didn't, like, if you were getting joy,

Until the opposition go and counteract that, you keep going after the places where you're getting the joy.

You keep landing the ball down there into the danger zone.

And until that kind of, you know, dries up, then I would say, right, grand, you can go short.

But I think Waterford made a mistake.

They were going short when they should have been going long in that first half.