Jonathan Caplan KC
speaker
434 appearances
1 recordings
1 series
first heard Jul 2026
last heard 29 Jul
Jonathan Caplan KC’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Jul 2026 with 1.
Appearances
so yeah this is a kind of technology that simply does not exist it defies our laws of physics and then there are mathematicians like eric weinstein who are top mathematicians and physicists who would tell you that um they know there's only probably 10 theoretical top physicists in the world none of them would be able to explain this
and therefore there's nobody in government or in private contractors who would be able to manufacture this.
Well, I wonder if Ross actually would still say that today.
And as you say, Fravor was one of those who, who's a witness, said, look, this is absolutely not the case.
But I mean, I think logic really defies that statement.
Even assuming, which isn't the case, that this technology existed, you would never insert it into the middle of a naval exercise without informing the pilots and the commanders of that exercise.
I mean, the risks would be enormous.
And it's not just one incident, the Nimitz.
I mean, these things have been appearing all over the world.
And there's even a rumour that, probably more than a rumour, I mean, I think Ross also will tell you that we're in the same breath, that he has evidence that a Tic Tac has been recovered in Russia and that there were biologics with it and also an advanced energy weapon.
So I don't think that evidence quite squares with the information he was given.
I think that was quite clearly a counterintelligence piece of misinformation.
And we know, I mean, that...
at least when we say we know, I've spoken to people in different areas of the three-letter agencies and they're trying to reverse engineer this technology, which they have.
I can't tell you how successful they've been because I simply don't know, but I do know that they have not been that successful and that they've run up against problems.
And I am absolutely certain that David Fravor and others are right, that this technology and this physics is not something that we have available to us today.
Well, certainly, I mean, legal reasons, actually, I'm happy to say, we had no legal, obviously, the book was checked legally, we had no problems.
And I wasn't anticipating that, for example, the CIA or any officers were going to sue us, because of course, that would give credibility to the book.
Excluding stuff, yes, a lot.
I've been very, very rigorous in excluding material that I feel either is unreliable or which I believe is strongly unreliable because I only want to include in that material which I am absolutely comfortable with.
Showing 141–160 of 434 · page 8 of 22
← Previous
Next →