Jordan Harbinger

Corbin said he was also very glad that you know you're playing the long game. In his view, that's good because just short of an act of God, that's what it's going to take to win here. To quote Corbin, court cases are marathons. In fact, he describes the court battle as a war between two competing stories.

Corbin said he was also very glad that you know you're playing the long game. In his view, that's good because just short of an act of God, that's what it's going to take to win here. To quote Corbin, court cases are marathons. In fact, he describes the court battle as a war between two competing stories.

Corbin said he was also very glad that you know you're playing the long game. In his view, that's good because just short of an act of God, that's what it's going to take to win here. To quote Corbin, court cases are marathons. In fact, he describes the court battle as a war between two competing stories.

And those stories are being evaluated and essentially voted upon by a decision maker, in your case, a judge. So it's not enough to just have a good and compelling story. It also has to be good and compelling to that judge. In Corbin's view, just based on the facts you've shared, at this moment, you have several things going for you and many things going against you.

And those stories are being evaluated and essentially voted upon by a decision maker, in your case, a judge. So it's not enough to just have a good and compelling story. It also has to be good and compelling to that judge. In Corbin's view, just based on the facts you've shared, at this moment, you have several things going for you and many things going against you.

And those stories are being evaluated and essentially voted upon by a decision maker, in your case, a judge. So it's not enough to just have a good and compelling story. It also has to be good and compelling to that judge. In Corbin's view, just based on the facts you've shared, at this moment, you have several things going for you and many things going against you.

Right now, his sense was that your history, it would show that you walked into an abusive relationship that resulted in a serious injury, that you have restraining orders against you, that you've been accused of violating those orders. This might not all be true, but that's how it could easily look from the court's perspective.

Right now, his sense was that your history, it would show that you walked into an abusive relationship that resulted in a serious injury, that you have restraining orders against you, that you've been accused of violating those orders. This might not all be true, but that's how it could easily look from the court's perspective.

Right now, his sense was that your history, it would show that you walked into an abusive relationship that resulted in a serious injury, that you have restraining orders against you, that you've been accused of violating those orders. This might not all be true, but that's how it could easily look from the court's perspective.

Also, we don't know what state you live in, but Corbyn said the laws around orders of protection and restraining orders, they're pretty draconian. No contact. Doesn't matter if the person supposedly being protected by the orders initiates that contact, there can be no contact. And the reason for this is that a restraining order is a court order. And it is the court that enforces it.

Also, we don't know what state you live in, but Corbyn said the laws around orders of protection and restraining orders, they're pretty draconian. No contact. Doesn't matter if the person supposedly being protected by the orders initiates that contact, there can be no contact. And the reason for this is that a restraining order is a court order. And it is the court that enforces it.

Also, we don't know what state you live in, but Corbyn said the laws around orders of protection and restraining orders, they're pretty draconian. No contact. Doesn't matter if the person supposedly being protected by the orders initiates that contact, there can be no contact. And the reason for this is that a restraining order is a court order. And it is the court that enforces it.

It's not up to your ex. So if it comes out that you did violate the court's orders, there are likely to be consequences. And yeah, it doesn't matter if he was like, ah, just drop by. It's not up to him.

It's not up to your ex. So if it comes out that you did violate the court's orders, there are likely to be consequences. And yeah, it doesn't matter if he was like, ah, just drop by. It's not up to him.

It's not up to your ex. So if it comes out that you did violate the court's orders, there are likely to be consequences. And yeah, it doesn't matter if he was like, ah, just drop by. It's not up to him.

Look, if he had said drop by and then you had gotten randomly caught by the police violating your restraining order, which wouldn't happen, that's one thing. But the fact that they were like, she's harassing us. And this is after he told you, yeah, sure, drop this stuff off. I mean, that's no good. And if it comes out that your ex

Look, if he had said drop by and then you had gotten randomly caught by the police violating your restraining order, which wouldn't happen, that's one thing. But the fact that they were like, she's harassing us. And this is after he told you, yeah, sure, drop this stuff off. I mean, that's no good. And if it comes out that your ex

Look, if he had said drop by and then you had gotten randomly caught by the police violating your restraining order, which wouldn't happen, that's one thing. But the fact that they were like, she's harassing us. And this is after he told you, yeah, sure, drop this stuff off. I mean, that's no good. And if it comes out that your ex

baited you into this violation by acting in bad faith, like we just discussed, that carries a certain level of consequences for him. Not least of those consequences is a loss of the court's trust, which is the highest currency that you have with a judge.

baited you into this violation by acting in bad faith, like we just discussed, that carries a certain level of consequences for him. Not least of those consequences is a loss of the court's trust, which is the highest currency that you have with a judge.