Josh Dubin
👤 PersonAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
I gave the crime scene technician, the fingerprint analyst, all of who played a part in his wrongful conviction, I said, Mr. Aguirre's here. Would you like to apologize to him? No, sir, I will not. Yeah, they won't do it. So he exonerates Nancy Smith and- Joseph Allen. Joseph Allen. And all of these folks that prosecuted Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, law enforcement, law
I gave the crime scene technician, the fingerprint analyst, all of who played a part in his wrongful conviction, I said, Mr. Aguirre's here. Would you like to apologize to him? No, sir, I will not. Yeah, they won't do it. So he exonerates Nancy Smith and- Joseph Allen. Joseph Allen. And all of these folks that prosecuted Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, law enforcement, law
the prosecutors, they all turn on him. I had no idea about anything.
the prosecutors, they all turn on him. I had no idea about anything.
the prosecutors, they all turn on him. I had no idea about anything.
So just so we're clear, this prosecutor... Rosenbaum prosecuted Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, and I believe he prosecuted all four of the Ohio Four.
So just so we're clear, this prosecutor... Rosenbaum prosecuted Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, and I believe he prosecuted all four of the Ohio Four.
So just so we're clear, this prosecutor... Rosenbaum prosecuted Nancy Smith and Joseph Allen, and I believe he prosecuted all four of the Ohio Four.
So after I presented to J.D., he had a cart. This is like a popular thing with prosecutors. They wheel in a cart of evidence. You know, it's like a shopping cart, it looks like, without the... Full of files. Yeah, and it's full of files. And he had read a lot of it in years prior, and he said he wanted to re-familiarize himself with more. So...
So after I presented to J.D., he had a cart. This is like a popular thing with prosecutors. They wheel in a cart of evidence. You know, it's like a shopping cart, it looks like, without the... Full of files. Yeah, and it's full of files. And he had read a lot of it in years prior, and he said he wanted to re-familiarize himself with more. So...
So after I presented to J.D., he had a cart. This is like a popular thing with prosecutors. They wheel in a cart of evidence. You know, it's like a shopping cart, it looks like, without the... Full of files. Yeah, and it's full of files. And he had read a lot of it in years prior, and he said he wanted to re-familiarize himself with more. So...
I think we both canceled our Thanksgiving plans and got into a lot of, I was annoyed because when I left Ohio, it was so obvious to me that these men were innocent and that there was a terrible mistake made and a federal court never goes out of their way to say something like this. I have the opinion here. And I showed this to JD and his chief of staff. And it says this is the way it concludes.
I think we both canceled our Thanksgiving plans and got into a lot of, I was annoyed because when I left Ohio, it was so obvious to me that these men were innocent and that there was a terrible mistake made and a federal court never goes out of their way to say something like this. I have the opinion here. And I showed this to JD and his chief of staff. And it says this is the way it concludes.
I think we both canceled our Thanksgiving plans and got into a lot of, I was annoyed because when I left Ohio, it was so obvious to me that these men were innocent and that there was a terrible mistake made and a federal court never goes out of their way to say something like this. I have the opinion here. And I showed this to JD and his chief of staff. And it says this is the way it concludes.
It goes through the things that the juries in the case heard that were bad about Avery, that he was a liar, he was a liar. But it didn't have – all these prosecutors that are trying to protect convictions and the man that's the county prosecutor now in his motion to withdraw J.D. 's decision to grant these men a new trial and then dismiss the case. We're going to get to this in a minute.
It goes through the things that the juries in the case heard that were bad about Avery, that he was a liar, he was a liar. But it didn't have – all these prosecutors that are trying to protect convictions and the man that's the county prosecutor now in his motion to withdraw J.D. 's decision to grant these men a new trial and then dismiss the case. We're going to get to this in a minute.
It goes through the things that the juries in the case heard that were bad about Avery, that he was a liar, he was a liar. But it didn't have – all these prosecutors that are trying to protect convictions and the man that's the county prosecutor now in his motion to withdraw J.D. 's decision to grant these men a new trial and then dismiss the case. We're going to get to this in a minute.
This is what ended up happening. He says, well, these cases have gone through the courts for 30 years. That could be said about every single human that has ever been exonerated in this country. It's the weakest argument. It's the weakest argument. What's the evidence that they did it? And here's one court that says, had the jury also been able to consider Avery's unsolicited 2004 recantation?
This is what ended up happening. He says, well, these cases have gone through the courts for 30 years. That could be said about every single human that has ever been exonerated in this country. It's the weakest argument. It's the weakest argument. What's the evidence that they did it? And here's one court that says, had the jury also been able to consider Avery's unsolicited 2004 recantation?
This is what ended up happening. He says, well, these cases have gone through the courts for 30 years. That could be said about every single human that has ever been exonerated in this country. It's the weakest argument. It's the weakest argument. What's the evidence that they did it? And here's one court that says, had the jury also been able to consider Avery's unsolicited 2004 recantation?