J.R. Fruen

speaker

626 appearances 10 recordings 1 series first heard Jan 2026 last heard 7 Jul

J.R. Fruen’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 10 in all, peaking in Jun 2026 with 2.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Cupertino City Council · City Council April 21, 2026 Non-Televised Closed Session Meeting (6:00) and Televised Regular Meeting (6:45) - Apr 21, 2026 · 21 Apr 2026 meeting

Thank you.

I was hoping that maybe you could elaborate on how the bingo fee was calculated.

So we'd have to go back and look at that particular report from three years ago.

Correct.

Through the mayor on a point of clarification, I just wanted to make certain that we're talking about the senior center bingo, not St.

Yeah, we've had previous requests from folks who do run bingo in the city with respect to what the total prize payout is.

so so

Aye.

Cupertino City Council · City Council March 3, 2026 Televised Special Meeting (5:30) and Televised Regular City Council Meeting (6:45) - Mar 03, 2026 · 3 Mar 2026 meeting

I'm sorry.

So under current state law, any member of the public could trigger via objection the requirement of an election.

So I think it's a very different process from the Surplus Land Act declarations or the vacation of a public right-of-way.

I am concerned about the amount of cost given what our budget outlook looks like.

That seems like a waste of money.

So to the extent that we can constrain the cost of it, I think that's valuable.

And to look at whether we could have a new sui generis

So that sounds like a reasonable summation.

I would just say one way or the other that correcting the zoning seems like it would be a good thing to do even if we weren't to proceed and that that would be a mechanism by which a number of sites could enjoy state law protections that our regular park lands currently enjoy.

Yeah, just for the record, since there seems to be some confusion both in the public and on council, that when the matter of the sports center came to council, the vote to exclude the sports center and any sort of move on it was unanimous.

Yeah, so just a couple things to start off here.

I wanted to caution that though you could certainly see a situation where someone has an existing application that's been approved at a lower density, even if that person were to come back with a new application on the same site, HCD and the statutes themselves presume a certain affordability level based upon

Showing 281–300 of 626 · page 15 of 32