Karoline Leavitt

Is there a risk with you describing her as a deranged leftist, talking about very specific facts of these events, when an investigation is just beginning?

Are you preempting a thorough investigation by drawing such conclusions?

And have you received any information beyond the videos we've seen publicly about this individual per specific acts that has informed your point of view?

Thanks for taking my question.

So the head of Minnesota's investigations agency says that the U.S.

Attorney's Office has essentially cut off the state investigations agency's access to the investigation.

What is the precedent for that and why shouldn't the Minnesota officials on the ground have access and evidence to work on this investigation?

Miksi presidentti Trumpi saa MRI-kysymyksen aiemmin? Kuten presidentti Trumpi sanoi, hän kysyisi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi läpi

The White House is working on an executive order to strengthen our elections in this country and to ensure that there cannot be blatant fraud as we've seen in California with their universal mail-in voting system. It's absolutely true that there's fraud in California's elections. It's just a fact.

Se on vain totuus. Heillä on yksilöllinen kirjoitusjärjestelmä, jota tiedämme olevan valitettava. Ja jos haluat välttämättä, olen iloinen, että voin antaa sinulle kaiken näkökulman, ja olisin iloinen, että voin antaa sinulle sen tehtäväksi. Miksi ne ovat valitettavissa? Ne ovat valitettavissa.

other people and the names of illegal aliens who shouldn't be voting in American elections. There's countless examples and we'd be happy to provide them. As for executive action the White House is taking, yes, we are looking into that. And like any executive order, of course, any executive order the president signs is within his full executive authority and within the confines of the law.

How would that not violate the court order? I've now answered this question several times, Gabe. We are complying with the court's order. We are getting the payments out the door as quickly as we can. USDA sent the guidance to the state. The president is referring to future SNAP payments. He does not want to have to keep tapping in to an emergency fund and depleting it. In the case of a catastrophe in this country, he wants to have those funds preserved, as they should be. And he's made it very clear, Democrats should reopen the government. I have one final...

...to our air traffic control system in the United States of America stops. It is...

Karen, kyllä. Lopuksi puheenvuoron jälkeen. Sanoit, että Yhdysvallat on oltava keskustelemaan sitä demokraattisilta. Mikä olisi se keskustelu? Yhdysvallan presidentti lopetti sen vuonna 2019. Mikä olisi se keskustelu? Miksi se on oltava keskustelu?

Karin, kuten sanoin, republikaanit puhuvat tästä nyt demokraattisista. En halua päästä keskustelemaan niistä. Mutta kun olemme sopimassa SNAP-kysymykseen, niin Yhdysvallat ja hallitukset ovat aina sopimassa lainsäädäntöön. Olemme aina sopimassa lainsäädäntöön, mutta republikaatit keskustelevat tämän asian nyt demokraattisista. Miksi ei kuitenkaan pitäisi pysyä huomioon, ettei niitä tarvita?

No, the administration is fully complying with the court order. I just spoke to the president about it. The recipients of these SNAP benefits need to understand it's going to take some time to receive this money. Because the Democrats have forced the administration into a very untenable position. We are digging into a contingency fund that is supposed to be for emergencies, catastrophes, for war.

President does not want to have to tap into this fund in the future, and that's what he was referring to in his Truth Social post. The Department of Agriculture, as for the latest SNAP payment in the judge's order, put out guidance to states today on how to get that money to the recipients of SNAP.

But it's going to take some time. The best way to get the full amount of SNAP benefits to those beneficiaries is for Democrats to reopen the government. So to anyone who is a SNAP beneficiary at home who needs that assistance, and the president was just saying, this is for people who are truly needy, who need food.

When it comes to pardons, the White House takes them with the utmost seriousness and the president understands the responsibility that he has as president to issue clemency and issue pardons to individuals who are seeking that. That's why we have a very thorough review process here that moves with the Department of Justice and the White House Counsel's Office. There's a whole team of qualified lawyers who look at every single pardon request that ultimately make their way up to the president of the United States. He's the ultimate final decision maker.

Ja hän oli hyvin selkeä, kun hän tuli hallitukseen, että hän oli suurin piirtein kiinnostunut katsomaan pysyvää ihmisiä, jotka olivat vahvistuneet ja käyttäneet Bidenin justiukseen ja olivat yliopistettaneet vahvistuneen järjestelmän. Ja se henkilö, johon puhutte, se oli todennäköisesti tapauksessa. Jopa jäsen sanoi hänen tapauksessaan, että Bidenin järjestelmän käsittely oli väärä ja meni liikaa.