Kate Shaw
speaker
3,267 appearances
14 recordings
4 series
first heard Dec 2024
last heard 15 Sep
Kate Shaw’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 11 in all, peaking in Sep 2026 with 4.
Appearances
I'm now ordering the parties.
to be able to answer whether or not there is this case in controversy and to pretty much tell me whether or not I can move forward with reopening this, pulling the final judgment out, and reopening it to be able to make inquiry into this perpetration of fraud.
Yeah, so it is basically, right, this friend of the court brief that allows her to kind of reopen the case to consider.
This is a kind of narrow question, right, of whether there's been fraud on the court under both Rule 11 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and also...
the inherent authority of any federal court to sanction lawyers who engage in misconduct in her court.
And this was a 50-plus page opinion.
I don't think we've said how long it was.
58 pages, yes.
And it really is quite a read if you're looking for some beach reading this summer.
It is just like the kind of distillation of...
like righteous outrage at the abuse of the courts and the legal process that the sequence of events that we have just been describing represents like just jumps off the page like it really is quite a read so as a bottom line matter the opinion concludes what we have just been saying was kind of obvious from the jump there was never a live lawsuit this was all a ruse the president controls the executive branch slaughter the case that we've already talked about in the show
a bunch of times, the one that gives the president complete authority over the heads even of independent agencies, Slaughter resolves any doubts that might have lingered about the president's control over the executive branch.
And since he controls the executive branch, the defendant, and he certainly is the plaintiff in this case, there is no possible way he could be adverse to himself.
And
Just to read a couple of quotes from the Williams opinion, she says, "...the nature of the suit itself and the conduct of the parties and counsel make plain this was an attempt to use the court to provide some legitimacy to an agreement to confer immunity to people and entities affiliated with the president."
That's the tax immunity piece of it.
But also with respect to kind of making this fund, "...the issue before the court is whether the lawyers ignored ethical norms, court rules, and legal authority to manipulate the judicial process..."
to guild their efforts to gain unprecedented access to the public fisc with a patina of legitimacy.
So you can, again, this is like legal kind of sounding language, but the rage is there, like absolutely.
So, you know, there is this...
Showing 1801–1820 of 3,267 · page 91 of 164
← Previous
Next →