Kelly Cox

speaker

2,539 appearances 36 recordings 2 series first heard May 2024 last heard 15 Sep

Kelly Cox’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 14 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 3.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Santa Clara City Council · City Council and Authorities Concurrent on 2025-11-04 5:30 PM - Nov 04, 2025 · 4 Nov 2025 meeting

And if we could, probably a long shot, but get a total estimated dollar amount that would be deferred based on those projects. podcast-host

I wanted to talk a little bit about the city manager discretion that's mentioned in there. podcast-host

It says that a deferral, if it would negatively affect the park expansion efforts, that would be considered. podcast-host

But is there a policy or guideline going to be established for that? podcast-host

Or is that like a case-by-case basis? podcast-host

And do those decisions come back to council for information? podcast-host

For the enforcement mechanism, it says that the city cannot foreclose without senior leader consent, but I don't know how realistic it is that the developing or the construction lenders would want to consent to foreclosure. podcast-host

So I'm wondering if withholding the certificate occupancy is enough there, and if the city attorney has been included in that review process to see if the limitations and advisement on enforceability is... podcast-host

realistic if the liens of a project are in financial distress. podcast-host

The sunset date expires December 31st, 2027. podcast-host

So I want to know what we'll use to evaluate if the program should be extended. podcast-host

And then finally, I think that the main problem we're trying to solve here is that it is challenging to develop podcast-host

But like you said, we're talking about one of many fees. podcast-host

And so does this do enough to jumpstart development again in our city? podcast-host

I know you guys mentioned that you wanna look at other potential things and I wonder if we adversely vote on one then and then piecemeal like a larger fee deferral together at a later date. podcast-host

I mean, does it make more sense to bring those together? podcast-host

I understand those urgency and I'm glad there's some developers here because in general, does this solve the problem? podcast-host

It's a small step out of what probably could be a more robust fee deferral program for our city. podcast-host

I wonder if this just the park parts does enough or when you guys talk about moving it into other fees, what would be next under consideration? podcast-host

Thank you. podcast-host

Showing 941–960 of 2,539 · page 48 of 127