Kevin McKernan
speaker
709 appearances
2 recordings
2 series
first heard Nov 2024
last heard 5 Dec
Kevin McKernan’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Dec 2025 with 1.
Appearances
It is the same story because the origin of replication that they have in Pfizer is an SV40 origin of replication. And they also have you'll see that little promoter thing up there in pink. they have another promoter over by your antibiotic resistance gene and your selectable marker. They have multiple promoters. On the Pfizer one, there's one over by that green arrow. That is an SV40 promoter.
And those elements are from what contaminated the polio vaccines. Now, the polio vaccines were contaminated with a full virus. It was like 5,500-letter viruses. But if you study that virus, the most carcinogenic aspects of it are the things that are in Pfizer. They are basically the SV40 enhancer and promoter and the origin of replication.
So the parts that are the most carcinogenic are in there, and they hid them from the regulators. When they submitted this to the FDA, the FDA demands that you give them a map like this that tells them what everything does. Like, show us where every selectable marker is, where every promoter is, where every open reading frame is. You have to disclose it all.
And the one area that Pfizer refused to disclose was the SV40 components. Right.
Yeah.
Simeon virus. Simeon virus number 40.
At least 40 of them. At least 40 of them.
Yes. Now, that was the story about the LINAC. They were using the LINAC to actually do mutagenesis on the viruses to mutate them to see if they could get ones that were more potent as a bioweapon. Jesus Christ. And they were planning to kill Castro or something with it, right?
It was a crazy story. I didn't know about that when I stumbled into this. I sadly learned about that after the fact and questioned whether I'd actually would have ran away and hidden the mountains if I had known that prior to disclosing this. But It is important to know we don't have the whole virus here.
We have components in the virus here that I think are actually still very problematic and dangerous, but we don't have as firm of a grip on is this causing the turbo cancers that people are claiming to come out of this vaccine. I think that's a more complicated story that there's a Swiss army knife of problems in the vaccines that can drive cancer, and the SV40 may just be one component of it.
one one hair that breaks the camel's back if you will there's there's um issues with the lnps there's issues with that that base i mentioned that pseudouridine base that completely scrambles your immune system um and then there's issues with repeat injecting this on people that their your immune system starts to become tolerant of pathogens when you do that there's this thing known as an igg4 class switch that happens with these vaccines so there there's a um oh and a fourth thing is the actual spike protein itself has been shown to inhibit
P53, which is a tumor suppressor gene that we have that cleans up your genome. So the protein that this plasmid's encoding shuts down your tumor surveillance. On top of that, the SV40 we know binds to p53, so that can't be good. You're shutting down the expression of p53 while you're also bombarding it with this SV40 DNA that probably makes it less functional. So it's a multiple hit problem.
We've got multiple things that are wrong with these vaccines that are probably driving cancer. But what's annoying about the SV40 stuff, it's completely preventable, and they hit it. And it didn't need to be there. So that's that's just a sign that the regulatory structure we have here is completely captured. They are they are not.
I mean, this didn't take a cannabis company shouldn't be finding this right. Like this is something the FDA should have sequenced the vaccines. It doesn't cost much to do this anymore. When when we started human genome, you know, way back when, when they came up, they came up with guidelines for vaccines to have no more than 10 picograms of DNA in vaccines that you inject in your arm.
Those are traditional vaccines.
Yes.
Very small amount. But your body, when you inject DNA naked like that, it's like a 10-minute half-life. It chews the stuff up really quickly.
But we're now in a new world where we have lipid nanoparticles protecting that material so it doesn't get chewed up. So arguably the number should be like attagrams. And the other thing that's happened in the time frame is they have dilated the amount of nanograms the pharmaceutical industry can have in vaccines a thousandfold.
So now it's up to 10 nanograms because since the pharmaceutical companies back in 1986 got a liability waiver, right? So now they're not liable. Every year they lobby for looser and looser regulations and they always get them. And so they've gotten to the point where they can put in 10 nanograms of DNA. On top of that, now it's on lipid nanoparticles, so it doesn't just get eaten up.
It goes right to your cells. And they're playing around with putting DNA in there that's replicatable once it gets inside of your cells. So you could sneak one molecule through, and it's a problem.
Showing 401–420 of 709 · page 21 of 36
← Previous
Next →