Kevin McKernan

Yeah, this might be a faster route because I think he links to them in here. Oh, does he? Yeah, so he's gone and FOID a lot of these people, so these are documents that should have links to the source material. Okay. It might be hard to get these.

Yeah, this might be a faster route because I think he links to them in here. Oh, does he? Yeah, so he's gone and FOID a lot of these people, so these are documents that should have links to the source material. Okay. It might be hard to get these.

Yeah.

Yeah.

Yeah.

But that's a picture of the vaccine right there, the plasmid that we sequenced. So that red region is the spike that's supposed to encode it. When they get this plasmid out of a coli, they will run an in vitro transcription reaction on that to make their RNA. It's a fancy word for just putting polymerase in that turns DNA into RNA.

But that's a picture of the vaccine right there, the plasmid that we sequenced. So that red region is the spike that's supposed to encode it. When they get this plasmid out of a coli, they will run an in vitro transcription reaction on that to make their RNA. It's a fancy word for just putting polymerase in that turns DNA into RNA.

But that's a picture of the vaccine right there, the plasmid that we sequenced. So that red region is the spike that's supposed to encode it. When they get this plasmid out of a coli, they will run an in vitro transcription reaction on that to make their RNA. It's a fancy word for just putting polymerase in that turns DNA into RNA.

But what's on the left side of this plasmid is all the shit that shouldn't be there. Those are all the components that make this thing replicate in E. coli. And the corner that Pfizer cut is they left components in here that let it replicate to a million cells. Those shouldn't be in any vaccine. So they have the SV40 origin of replication in there. They have the SV40 enhancer in the promoter.

But what's on the left side of this plasmid is all the shit that shouldn't be there. Those are all the components that make this thing replicate in E. coli. And the corner that Pfizer cut is they left components in here that let it replicate to a million cells. Those shouldn't be in any vaccine. So they have the SV40 origin of replication in there. They have the SV40 enhancer in the promoter.

But what's on the left side of this plasmid is all the shit that shouldn't be there. Those are all the components that make this thing replicate in E. coli. And the corner that Pfizer cut is they left components in here that let it replicate to a million cells. Those shouldn't be in any vaccine. So they have the SV40 origin of replication in there. They have the SV40 enhancer in the promoter.

So Moderna doesn't have that stuff. They do have a plasmin, but it doesn't have any mammalian replication machinery in it. So that's kind of case in point that it was superfluous and unneeded. They didn't need to do this. Pfizer could have picked a different vector that didn't have this risk because their competitor pulled it off.

So Moderna doesn't have that stuff. They do have a plasmin, but it doesn't have any mammalian replication machinery in it. So that's kind of case in point that it was superfluous and unneeded. They didn't need to do this. Pfizer could have picked a different vector that didn't have this risk because their competitor pulled it off.

So Moderna doesn't have that stuff. They do have a plasmin, but it doesn't have any mammalian replication machinery in it. So that's kind of case in point that it was superfluous and unneeded. They didn't need to do this. Pfizer could have picked a different vector that didn't have this risk because their competitor pulled it off.

And their competitor has lower amounts of DNA contamination coming through. Now, I can't say that I've seen data that suggests one vaccine is worse than the other when you look at VAERS. So people are still trying to sort that out. But there is certainly a concentration of adverse events on these vaccines on certain lot numbers. The ELOT numbers are notoriously bad.

And their competitor has lower amounts of DNA contamination coming through. Now, I can't say that I've seen data that suggests one vaccine is worse than the other when you look at VAERS. So people are still trying to sort that out. But there is certainly a concentration of adverse events on these vaccines on certain lot numbers. The ELOT numbers are notoriously bad.

And their competitor has lower amounts of DNA contamination coming through. Now, I can't say that I've seen data that suggests one vaccine is worse than the other when you look at VAERS. So people are still trying to sort that out. But there is certainly a concentration of adverse events on these vaccines on certain lot numbers. The ELOT numbers are notoriously bad.

We've not yet sequenced those to know if they're any different. And why is that? They were some of the earlier lots. And so maybe they just didn't have their shit together on those lots. I don't have a good answer as to why. There's also some speculation there might have been a different plasmid in those, but we don't know that.

We've not yet sequenced those to know if they're any different. And why is that? They were some of the earlier lots. And so maybe they just didn't have their shit together on those lots. I don't have a good answer as to why. There's also some speculation there might have been a different plasmid in those, but we don't know that.

We've not yet sequenced those to know if they're any different. And why is that? They were some of the earlier lots. And so maybe they just didn't have their shit together on those lots. I don't have a good answer as to why. There's also some speculation there might have been a different plasmid in those, but we don't know that.