Kevin Park
speaker
19,091 appearances
74 recordings
2 series
first heard Sep 2023
last heard 6d ago
Kevin Park’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 21 in all, peaking in Jun 2026 with 3.
Appearances
But again, the process is we are putting a $10,000, $12,000 cost.
I have never seen anything less than $12,000 actually in my experience, onto residents unexpectedly.
It didn't come up in the very beginning.
They didn't they weren't told at the beginning of their project that, well, because of this, the
Work that you're doing, it triggers this requirement.
You're gonna have to do this later.
Um, it happened at final inspection.
Uh also the cost is is a non-trivial cost.
I mean, in some cases, that $12,000 was a a large percentage of the total um amount of work that they put into their houses.
And at if the city is better equipped at contracting out this work and getting this work done.
I mean, that reminds me of the suit sewer lateral question that came up in 2021, which is this is something most residents don't know about.
They don't think about this.
And then to be hit with this requirement for work that they have no experience in, that they didn't contract in because the people that they have doing the work that they need are not even this area to have to get to another contractor.
It just seems to me that would be better for the city to get this done so that
The city gets
Um the work done in a city approved way and then the costs can be shared by
by the residents, the people making the improvements, maybe with you know other other fees.
But the city can use their relationships with contractors and their work that needs to be done all throughout the city to to get this done much more cheaply.
But I understand the reason for this.
I would like to see this uh be removed as a requirement uh
Showing 621–640 of 19,091 · page 32 of 955
← Previous
Next →