Kevin Park
speaker
18,803 appearances
75 recordings
2 series
first heard Sep 2023
last heard 5d ago
Kevin Park’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 22 in all, peaking in Sep 2026 with 3.
Appearances
I think that was the point that Sue Reuter was making, and now you're telling me that that's not what we're doing.
Oh, but I'm pretty sure that it was.
We kept this vague because regulatory guidelines that were not state laws, we could still abide by them.
We could abide by anything that this discrimination, and that kind of goes against what you just said.
Yeah, so... But it would remove your...
your provision for things that were not stated into law that could be considered discriminatory.
Understood and I think you just again missed my point that this was supposed to cover encompass regulatory guidelines that were not That were not Embedded into law and I I think that's what I heard so sorry I will let you go back and I will let you consider this I'm not going to belabor this And answer the questions thing yeah, I think I think that's right I
You just told us that in investigations of the council or investigations of things that the DA would decline or choose not to investigate that you had that concern there as well.
So how could this be any different?
This is just as close, just as tight, and you've actually spent a lot of time on this.
And yet you admit that there are some things that you question your own impartiality.
And in this case, the impartiality would not necessarily be to the people, to the council, to the people that are part of the project.
It would be to the work that you are submitting to us.
At some point, the question would be how impartial would you be towards a recommendation that you are making to council?
like I've seen even in governance and ethics, how you are very, very emotional about some of the things that you bring before governance and ethics.
And I would be concerned that the things that you've spent even more time on as a charter review project would be again, subject to that sort of emotional attachment.
i think that the uh the comment wasn't about everything and for anyone i was my comment was that this the recommendations here are very broad and wide ranging and by not limiting them to a certain area or not limit them to a certain level that we have you know again one of the reasons why printing the entire text would be so long is because we're we are contemplating many many many different things
And as the city attorney said, we do that all the time.
Also want to remind us in 2024 when we put measure I on the ballot you had a little bit of a similar conversation Which was we know we were going to have an expenditure plan We know the council will adopt that expenditure plan and we're putting in The ballot language that the council will adopt that expenditure plan and how the council will adopt it in that case unanimous but what you asked us to do is
is to bring forward that expenditure plan and put that in the public communication so the public knew what that expenditure plan would be, even though the expenditure plan wasn't in the ballot question and it was clear that the council adopted that separately.
Showing 1361–1380 of 18,803 · page 69 of 941
← Previous
Next →