Konstantin Kisin

You go, none of this actually seems to make any type of logical sense.

But...

I think, and we've touched on it before, we are starting to see common sense start to come to the fore.

Is that true in the scientific community or is it still very much captured, do you think?

And Ian, when we talk about climate, we also talk about green technologies.

And the people who say, you know, they're doing very well, they're going to be able to replace certain technologies that we have.

Where do you stand on green technologies?

Are there some that are actually good and you think will make a positive impact?

Are there some that are just not there?

And are there others that you go, look, this is a busted flush, we need to stop funding this?

And why is it that we don't talk about nuclear energy more?

Why is it that when I read in the newspapers, we're talking about nuclear power plants being actually shut down?

Is it because we see Fukuyama and we get worried about a disaster like that?

Fukushima.

Fukushima, sorry.

Francis Fukuyama has made a lot of mistakes.

Well, you could say the end of history was a nuclear meltdown.

But yeah, I agree.

So Fukushima, or is it just a hangover from the Cold War where we, our entire generation, thought we were going to die in a nuclear war?

What role do you see advanced technologies like AI-driven modelling playing in reshaping the climate debate, especially when geological data spans millions of years?