Konstantin Kisin

I mean, so there's very basic things like, oh, the authoritarian government should not be the end

the end arbiter of how extremely powerful AI systems are maneuvered.

But beyond that, yeah, there's this dynamic of like, okay, well, then who should it be instead?

Should it be the model company?

Should it be the end user?

And this, I think, is like a live debate.

I mean, I've changed my mind over the last few weeks I've been thinking about this.

I've changed my mind about it a bunch of times.

I think it's a very thorny question.

But this is the project of political philosophy, really.

It's culminating in this question that people are not thinking about.

I think that will definitely be the case.

I think in history, nobody has had a good track record, really, of being able to say, I'm going to make this technology.

You know, Gutenberg was not trying to kick off the Reformation, right?

Francis is offended by that.

Have day!

Have day!

And so it's just very hard to... I think there will be this dynamic of, look, we're not going to be able to predict, much less to control, what happens in this future civilization that is run by AIs.

I think the thing we can't do is say...

AI is going to happen.