Konstantin Kisin

It's not struggling because taxes are too low.

Our economic woes are not the product of insufficient regulation.

But until the public makes the connection, the rapid rise of Zach Polanski and other redistribution enthusiasts is inevitable.

even if it means more of the policies that made us poor in the first place.

Our poverty is the direct result of net zero lunacy, welfarism, and chasing out anyone who wants to start a business and make it successful.

But it turns out many people don't realize that it's not them that's poor, it's the entire country.

And if we don't persuade them otherwise, they'll vote for people who'll make things worse again and again.

if you enjoy these monologues remember that they're available as articles on my sub stack at constantinkitchen.com weeks and sometimes months ahead of time so head on over there now and subscribe

I think it'll take five years, ten years.

And even for me, I've had to admit that the progress has been pretty fast.

I think at some point it will.

I mean, just think of it as more people.

If civilization had 10 billion more scientists, human scientists, would we make faster progress on aging?

I'm sure we would.

Here's another angle, mass surveillance.

The AIs have the potential to make authoritarian societies much more sustainable and powerful than they have been in the past.

A lot of the reasons that government has not been as authoritarian as it has in the past is that it's just physically not been possible.

How do we make sure that humans don't get totally disenfranchised?

Right.

How do we make sure of that?