Kristen Breitweiser

And so what you see is this systemic long-term carrying out of policy by American leaders, right?

whether it's a president, a vice president, whether it's members of Congress, the intel committees that are sort of looking past these failures of the intel community.

And again, it's not just the CIA.

The FBI has got plenty to explain with regard to the 9-11 attacks.

And they're never held accountable.

They sort of act with impunity and people make cool movies about them and everyone thinks that, you know, they're above the law.

The reality is, is that 3,000 Americans were killed on U.S.

soil and the CIA and FBI 100% could have and should have prevented it, the NSA also.

who does all the eavesdropping around the world, the wiretapping, they 100% had enough information to stop the attacks.

And for whatever reason, the attacks weren't stopped.

So naturally speaking, when something happens,

A reasonable person is like, well, who benefited, right?

Like who benefited from not stopping this, from not preventing this murder of 3000 people?

And maybe in the early days, it was kind of hard to sort of decipher that.

I think now 24 years out, it's not that hard to figure out who benefited.

I know certainly who didn't benefit.

But I think that that's something that the American public needs to start considering and start wondering why we have a government that's not willing to hold people that are responsible for this nation's worst terrorist attack accountable for their failures and for their, you know, in some ways negligence, I believe criminal negligence and not stopping the attacks.

I mean, I think that there's an institutional block on saying it out loud.

I think it's exceedingly uncomfortable to think that there's blood on the hands of the United States government and its intelligence community.

And I think that there's a long game here where the more time that passes, the less and less interested the American public is, right?