Kristen Waggoner
speaker
475 appearances
4 recordings
2 series
first heard Jan 2026
last heard 1 Jul
Kristen Waggoner’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsRecordings per month over the last 12 months — 4 in all, peaking in Jan 2026 with 2.
Appearances
I think there was general consensus that males have an advantage over women.
And so I was encouraged that Justice Kagan, as an example, was grappling with what the argument was of the ACLU in terms of under the Equal Protection Clause, how they would actually prove without completely messing up the constitutional standards that are already in place.
Essentially what the ACLU is arguing under the constitutional argument is for an individualized analysis and an individualized level of scrutiny that requires a perfect fit.
So I don't want to go too deep in the weeds on that, but that would be impossible.
That would mean every time the state passes a law, if someone could demonstrate that the reason for that law doesn't apply to them, they likely would have a constitutional argument under the Equal Protection Clause, which is absolutely crazy.
Yes, because they are saying you take into account all of these different attributes.
And of course, it muddles the meaning of sex.
If it's impossible to define sex, we need to understand that's going to affect a whole host of laws and frankly, all of Western civilization.
If we are denying the created order and biological truth and the fact that there are legitimate differences between men and women.
And that's truly what's at trial in this case is whether those differences can be taken into account by states.
The answer has to be yes, that they can.
They were thrilled.
We had a wonderful gala that you were at even, where we brought the whole movement together to just celebrate what had happened and the milestone that was created and giving them a chance.
And we had probably three dozen girls who came to the stage who were litigants in the case, in different cases along the way, who have stood for their rights.
And they have suffered as a result, not just on cancellation or censorship, but real tangible penalties.
I think they were disappointed not to hear more about those who are experiencing this in the courtroom.
But outside the courtroom, they did everything they could to have their voices heard.
Thank you.
Well, I loved hearing your take first because, you know, I feel like we're all somewhat emotionally invested in it, but when you're sitting in it and you kind of know the ins and outs, let's just start with the court.
I mean, I think overall I agree with your take.
Showing 261–280 of 475 · page 14 of 24
← Previous
Next →