Krystal Ball

And at a certain point, I actually am willing to believe that.

I don't think it would be the first time in human history a company

is claiming extraordinary things about his product.

But I think I have now seen enough evidence from the ownership of the company and the people inside those companies who believe the truth about what they're saying to be concerned.

And I also think to follow the trail of some of these different things, we should really take it very seriously.

Like with D2, when we put it up here on the screen,

I think if we go through and we really scrutinize what they're saying is that setting off the global alarms and emergency response from banks and intelligence agencies is outside evidence that their claims may actually be true.

So when the bank is able to report –

infiltration, and then an intelligence agency is able to say, hey, this is actually getting through a vital firewall.

This is not an exaggeration of the AI model.

It's actually a real concern that they have, which we are not grappling with.

And the bigger problem

as you said, is no federal scrutiny.

Here's the, like, you can't even bring, let's take drugs, right?

Like a real drug, like a medical drug.

You cannot bring a medical drug to market, which will affect, you can't even bring a medical drug to market, which will affect a few thousand people in a genetic subgroup without rigorous evidence, safety data, and regulator approval.

All of us agree with that.

However, you can bring a phone to market and basically, as long as you comply with a few different various consumer regulations, it's fine what the phone does.

Let's take that to the AI.

Let's take it seriously.