Krystal Ball

infiltration, and then an intelligence agency is able to say, hey, this is actually getting through a vital firewall.

This is not an exaggeration of the AI model.

It's actually a real concern that they have, which we are not grappling with.

And the bigger problem

as you said, is no federal scrutiny.

Here's the, like, you can't even bring, let's take drugs, right?

Like a real drug, like a medical drug.

You cannot bring a medical drug to market, which will affect, you can't even bring a medical drug to market, which will affect a few thousand people in a genetic subgroup without rigorous evidence, safety data, and regulator approval.

All of us agree with that.

However, you can bring a phone to market and basically, as long as you comply with a few different various consumer regulations, it's fine what the phone does.

Let's take that to the AI.

Let's take it seriously.

They're saying this can, a piece of software which will radically change security and has so much danger that we have to selectively approve it.

There's no regulatory body which says signed off.

Now, some of it is scary, right?

Do you really want the CIA and others to be signing off?

Because maybe they're signing off because they've been given a zero day.

So I accept some of the more libertarian critiques here.

But this is so globally important.

It just seems to me like you've got to have, I don't know, a presidential advisory body or something, which is saying we've come.