Manolis Kellis

And then you go back and you get it.

And this whole concept of...

we're very often sort of partly aware of why we're doing things and we can kind of run on autopilot for a bunch of stuff.

And this whole concept of sort of making these stories for who we are and what our intents are,

And again, sort of, you know, trying to pretend that we're kind of on top of things.

It tastes good.

There's two components to that.

Basically, for a lot of these cognitive tasks where we're kind of motion planning and path planning, et cetera, maybe that's the neocortical component.

And then for, I don't know, intimate relationships, for food, for sleep and rest, for exercise, for overcoming obstacles, for surviving a crash or sort of pushing yourself to an extreme and sort of making it

I think a lot of these things are sort of deeper down and maybe not yet captured by these language models.

And that's sort of what I'm trying to get at when I'm basically saying, listen, there's a few things that are missing and there's like this whole embodied intelligence, this whole emotional intelligence, this whole sort of baggage of feelings of subcortical regions, et cetera.

I'm with you completely there.

We can debate whether it's today's systems or in 10 years or in 50 years, but that moment will come.

And ethically, I think we need to grapple with it.

We need to basically say that humans have always shown this extremely self-serving approach to everything around them.

Basically, we kill the planet, we kill animals, we kill everything around us just to our own service.

And maybe we shouldn't think of AI as our tool and as our assistant.

Maybe we should really think of it as our children.

And the same way that you are responsible for training those children, but they are independent human beings.

And at some point they will surpass you and they will sort of go off and