Marcella
π€ SpeakerAppearances Over Time
Podcast Appearances
It's just, I think that people need to think further in the future because any Democrat can use what Trump is doing now in their own fashion.
I'm not worried about that.
And I'll tell you why.
what's going to happen when somebody wants a mosque on the uh property right so i mean that's why there's checks and balances that's why i came to america because in my country there's no checks and balances so i actually i'm for checks and balances so to your point i mean i may be popular i'm not saying there there shouldn't be any checks and balances but i am thinking like you know first of all trump is maybe uniquely
But the analogy doesn't work there.
You can't compare that to the White House, which is a historical building.
That's the difference to me.
It's the White House.
I mean, it hasn't been that long since he started being president.
Well, guess who can change the rules?
congress can change those rules which i it comes again to congress not doing their job of actually um you know updating all these antiquated slow-moving rules and one of the reasons could be fraud um just my opinion
and possibly Trump's opinion, because he brought up the Federal Reserve Building in a post about this historic preservation.
He talked about the Federal Reserve Building that's taken so much
that they're not suing them to stop it, it's taken billions of dollars to build it, and now this that's not being paid by the Congress or any taxpayer, they're blocking that, possibly because that's not how it goes.
You didn't go through the right channels, you didn't pay the right lobbyists.
you know i i don't i should look into it but i think a lot of the justices are picked from the dc circuit um they're they're court of appeals judges already in dc and are well known to the political you know what i'm forgetting too i forgot dei
it's just so crazy yeah you know you know Scalia Justice Scalia my favorite justice of all time he used to be sometimes the only one because he would always be against you know against the grain and so there is some kind of thing in in the supreme court where you are kind of become entrenched
as with your own political viewpoints or, you know, your own legal viewpoints.
So she might be there and she might like that because she gets that attention.
Sure.