Marcus Hutter

So I have proven that this is the most intelligent agents which anybody could

built in quotation marks because it's just mathematical and you need infinite compute.

But this is the limit.

And this is completely specified.

It's not just a framework.

Every year, tens of frameworks are developed which discuss skeletons and then pieces are missing.

And usually these missing pieces turn out to be really, really difficult.

And so this is completely and uniquely defined.

And we can analyze that mathematically.

And we've also developed some approximations.

I can talk about that a little bit later.

That would be sort of the top-down approach, like, say, for Neumann's minimax theory, that's the theoretical optimal play of games.

And now we need to approximate it, put heuristics in, prune the tree, blah, blah, blah, and so on.

So we can do that also with the ICSI model, but for general AI.

It can also inspire those, and most of...

Most researchers go bottom up, right?

They have the systems, they try to make it more general, more intelligent.

It can inspire in which direction to go.

What do you mean by that?

So if you have some choice to make, right?