Mary Holland

And they said that therapists, doctors, professionals should be able to exercise free speech.

They were suppressing this therapist's speech.

And that's dangerous to all of us, Steve, right?

If we can't have open communication with our doctors, with our therapists, like what happened in COVID, we're in terrible trouble.

And so we expect now, based on this Supreme Court decision...

that our case in California, where first the state and then the medical board tried to suppress accurate speech around COVID, we're expecting that that case is now gonna be decided favorably, probably sent back by the Supreme Court.

But it's incredibly dangerous when a state says to a professional, particularly a doctor,

You can't have this speech with your patient or your client.

So that's what it's about.

Even Justice Kagan, who probably doesn't agree with the outcome, said it's a straightforward First Amendment issue.

And Justice Sotomayor joined with her.

The only dissident there was Justice Jackson, who in Missouri v. Biden had said what I consider to be bizarre things about how

You know, we can't let the First Amendment hamper the government.

No, that's the whole point, is that the government doesn't get to take sides because we in this democracy believe in the free marketplace of ideas.

Well, let me tell you where there's sort of clearly, you know, there has arisen kind of this issue within the Maha Maga Coalition, and that is around the use of the pesticide glyphosate.

Glyphosate is a poison.

It's intended to kill pests, bugs, and it's really harmful to humans.

It's especially harmful to children.

Steve, we wrote an amicus brief that we filed yesterday with the Supreme Court saying the Environmental Protection Agency is required to have

a 10 times threshold for dangerous products for children because children are so much more sensitive when they're developing than adults are.