Matt Boyle

It's 60%.

But in both cases, among those who support toppling the regime in Iran, they're asked, how many American lives are you willing to risk in so doing?

And in both cases, 51% said none.

They're not willing to risk a single American life.

What that means when you really drill down on this, because if you're going to topple the regime in Iran, you're probably going to cost American lives, right?

And then once you start getting higher and higher in the numbers, then some people are willing to go up to 10 American lives or up to 100 or up to 1,000 or whatever.

It's very, very few that are willing to go higher than that.

But when you really get into it, the real numbers are among the broader American public, around only 14% that support America toppling the regime in Iran.

And among Republicans, it's not really 60%, but it's down around 21%.

So this is a total drop off in the numbers when you actually count the loss of American life, which would probably be likely.

If this happens, I think Americans love what happened with Maduro, right, where it didn't cost a single American life.

It looks like there's the new leader there is an American puppet and doing whatever Rubio and then want them to want her to do.

If they could do something like that in Iran, I think that we would be open to that.

But the question is.

Is that optionality going to be presented to the president?

Where'd they go?

At Breitbart.com, on ex-Twitter, at mboyle1, and on True Social, at RealMattBoyle.

Yeah, well, look, I would call it the in Besant we trust address, right?

Like this is what we've all been saying across the MAGA movement is that Scott Besant, who is arguably the brightest economic mind in the nation, in the world, has been predicting a first half economic boom next year.

And the president laid out that.