Mia Wong

He just kind of posted it right when he got enough of a story and everything. He revealed that he was talking to a couple whistleblowers within the NHS about what was going down. And not only did he talk to some whistleblowers, but he also gained some independent evidence from himself, his own investigation, from meeting minutes from officials in the NHS.

And so what he found kind of began with the first whistleblower. This one was someone who did not reveal much about who they were publicly, presumably to protect their job. But Malcom said that with his whistleblowers, he independently confirmed that they did work for the NHS. He saw their IDs. Malcom's not the type of guy to lie. He's a trusted figure in the UK political scene.

And so what he found kind of began with the first whistleblower. This one was someone who did not reveal much about who they were publicly, presumably to protect their job. But Malcom said that with his whistleblowers, he independently confirmed that they did work for the NHS. He saw their IDs. Malcom's not the type of guy to lie. He's a trusted figure in the UK political scene.

And so what he found kind of began with the first whistleblower. This one was someone who did not reveal much about who they were publicly, presumably to protect their job. But Malcom said that with his whistleblowers, he independently confirmed that they did work for the NHS. He saw their IDs. Malcom's not the type of guy to lie. He's a trusted figure in the UK political scene.

First one said that there was only one reported suicide prior to 2020. Significance of 2020 in relation to trans healthcare at Night Kingdom is was that the infamous case Bell v. Tattestock.

First one said that there was only one reported suicide prior to 2020. Significance of 2020 in relation to trans healthcare at Night Kingdom is was that the infamous case Bell v. Tattestock.

First one said that there was only one reported suicide prior to 2020. Significance of 2020 in relation to trans healthcare at Night Kingdom is was that the infamous case Bell v. Tattestock.

I'm not going to go into detail of this case because it's convoluted and messy and hellish, but the gist of it is that it led to tightened restrictions on gender reform and care for minors, particularly in the realm of puberty lovers. This ruling ended up kind of restricting how it might act as puberty blockers some. It was later overturned, but it already led to lasting damage.

I'm not going to go into detail of this case because it's convoluted and messy and hellish, but the gist of it is that it led to tightened restrictions on gender reform and care for minors, particularly in the realm of puberty lovers. This ruling ended up kind of restricting how it might act as puberty blockers some. It was later overturned, but it already led to lasting damage.

I'm not going to go into detail of this case because it's convoluted and messy and hellish, but the gist of it is that it led to tightened restrictions on gender reform and care for minors, particularly in the realm of puberty lovers. This ruling ended up kind of restricting how it might act as puberty blockers some. It was later overturned, but it already led to lasting damage.

Even after it was overturned, a lot of doctors were hesitant to even prescribe puberty blockers because they were worried about political consequences. So a lot of minors weren't getting the care they need.

Even after it was overturned, a lot of doctors were hesitant to even prescribe puberty blockers because they were worried about political consequences. So a lot of minors weren't getting the care they need.

Even after it was overturned, a lot of doctors were hesitant to even prescribe puberty blockers because they were worried about political consequences. So a lot of minors weren't getting the care they need.

Yeah, and they use complete bogus justifications for this. They're like, we don't see any benefits of puberty blockers. And it's like, the point is not that they are benefiting these kids directly. No kid is like, oh boy, I get to be five years behind on puberty for my peers. I get to look like a 10-year-old while all my peers have full-on been everything. Oh boy. Like, no, the point is that

Yeah, and they use complete bogus justifications for this. They're like, we don't see any benefits of puberty blockers. And it's like, the point is not that they are benefiting these kids directly. No kid is like, oh boy, I get to be five years behind on puberty for my peers. I get to look like a 10-year-old while all my peers have full-on been everything. Oh boy. Like, no, the point is that

Yeah, and they use complete bogus justifications for this. They're like, we don't see any benefits of puberty blockers. And it's like, the point is not that they are benefiting these kids directly. No kid is like, oh boy, I get to be five years behind on puberty for my peers. I get to look like a 10-year-old while all my peers have full-on been everything. Oh boy. Like, no, the point is that

These kids are being deprived of the care they absolutely need to stay alive. And it's being targeted just for the sole purpose of getting cheap political from what are the hells in office.

These kids are being deprived of the care they absolutely need to stay alive. And it's being targeted just for the sole purpose of getting cheap political from what are the hells in office.

These kids are being deprived of the care they absolutely need to stay alive. And it's being targeted just for the sole purpose of getting cheap political from what are the hells in office.

But more back to the whistleblowers. So prior to 2020, when the Bellevue Tavistock ruling came into effect, only one transmitter died from suicide. I don't quite remember the time frame they used to estimate it, but it was broader than the one they used after. I believe it was like seven years, I think.