Michael McCarthy

I'd probably rather it be goals of some description because I do see goals.

I don't think Tottenham can keep Manchester City out.

And I think Tottenham have got goals in them as well.

Poor at home, as you guys said.

So, yeah, you have to go with Man City in the end, don't you?

If Arsenal do slip up and they've drawn the game at Elland Road, for instance, City then, it becomes even more must-win, doesn't it?

Because then you can really close that gap and start to exert some serious pressure on them.

But, yeah...

again another intriguing game it should be straightforward I wish City were just a bit better and then it would make me feel more comfortable yeah because they haven't done it in their big games away from home so far this season before we go Lee just wanted to ask you about

Yeah, well, 1-100 Wolves, 1-40 Burnley, then 4-9 West Ham.

Obviously, they've lengthened a little bit with the results over the last couple of weeks.

Forrest are then 11-2, so it's a big jump from West Ham to Forrest.

Then Leeds are 13-2, then Palace 7-1.

Next team is Tottenham after that.

I guess you've got to... I always look at the relegation markets, and obviously there are exceptions to this rule.

I always look at the relegation markets as trying to decide what do we think the total is going to be that's going to achieve safety

now earlier in the season when West Ham were well a few weeks ago when they were poorer I was thinking low 30s 32 points might just get you safety Tottenham are on 28 Crystal Palace are on 28 Leeds 26 Forest 25 West Ham 20 now West Ham have played 23 games got 20 points that's

that's what they average and that's what they will continue to average.

I find it hard to believe that they will average more than a point a game in this season when they're not already averaging a point a game after 23 matches.

So that, you know, they've won two games, great.