Miller Lite (Sponsor)
speaker
158 appearances
12 recordings
1 series
first heard Jan 2025
last heard Apr 2025
Miller Lite (Sponsor)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.
Trend
recordings per month · last 12 monthsNo recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.
Appearances
Wyatt, how would you answer that question as a recipient of this poll? You got a phone call. Somebody on the other line, Rasmussen. Wyatt's back. Who would you vote for in Kamala Harris versus Stephen A. Smith? What would you have said?
This is bad news for Gavin Newsom, I think, if you're looking at this. I mean, him and Stephen are competitors across multiple vectors now. They're both podcast hosts. Yes. They are both potential presidential candidates. And you would think that Gavin would have a little bit more...
space between him and and steven a you know in this situation governor of california has some experience people are basically like either seem fine so i don't know if that's good for steven a or seems like it's not great for gavin
Well, it indicates that there's about a third of the country that would literally respond in favor of anybody over J.D. Vance, formerly J.D. Hamill, formerly J.D. Bowman. You did have a lot of separate names. He's changed his name several times, which I think is a sign of sociopathy.
Was it check cashing? Unlike him. I don't think it was related to check cashing. Has Stephen A. Smith had multiple names or is his birth name Stephen A. Smith?
I think this stands out a little bit less as encouraging for Stephen A. Smith and more as discouraging for Vance. I mean, Trump just got 49%. Right. So he's 11% below that. Right. And I think that leads us to, you know, something that is pretty obvious, which is that, you know, he has less appeal than Donald Trump to certain groups of people.
Do you have any mixed feelings about J.D. Vance over that? Because I got to tell you, I really dislike him at a deep level. Like in my core, I find him to be probably the most unappealing person in all of public life. But he's a poster. And as a poster, I do feel like I have some kinship with him that I'm grappling with.
I agree with this. And this was where I disagreed with your earlier statement. We kind of got distracted. But you said something like, the only thing he can do is talk. Getting ready for the presidency is just figuring out how to talk, and it's more than that. Are we sure? Maybe that's not true, actually. Maybe ability to post and talk and to own J.D.
Vance to his potato beard face is really all we're looking for right now.
What we want versus what we deserve, I think, are two different questions.
The hero we might need. But like, is it more than talking? I mean, obviously the presidency is more than talking, but the better, the more appealing talker, maybe not the better talker, has like basically won every time, except for the COVID election recently. Obama was a very good talker. The Democrats have put up the last three times. Kamala Harris, who...
Had some skills talking, but also some demerits and deficits. She was not particularly strong speaking off the cuff.
Had she had more time?
For sure. Joe Biden couldn't talk at all.
Literally couldn't speak. So that wasn't great. Hillary, not exactly a dynamic talker, really. We'll put it back to my people, Jeb. And I love Jeb, like, personally. You put the exclamation point there. I did. I didn't, actually. But, you know, I emotionally put it in there.
Jeb! But, like, he was a terrible talker. And, you know, I do think we convince ourselves because there's this thing that, like, we want to believe it's about more than that. You know, we want to think, we want to, you know... pull people's higher angels, think about people's better angels, and think about all the serious problems that the country faces, and we need a person of depth.
And it's kind of like, I don't think the people really want a person of depth unless they're a good talker. Maybe we just need to accept that talking is a pretty key part of the job, and that the Democrats should probably orient themselves to finding somebody who's really, really good at talking, and then all the other skills are kind of secondary.
Yeah, I know, but it seems like Stephen A. would be an upgrade. I don't know. But he's not the president. I bet Meta Fredrickson of Denmark would be thrilled to see Stephen A. Smith right now.
I would look at this as really bad news for Kamala, actually, because you notice J.D. Vance's number went up when we added Kamala to the picture. So people, when it was just J.D. versus Stephen A., people were like, I'd like to learn a little bit more. But then when 2% of the people were like, once Kamala is even a possibility, they're like, no, f*** it.
Thank you. Thank you. Thank you.
Showing 21–40 of 158 · page 2 of 8
← Previous
Next →