Moira Penza

So that was the coercion that you see in terms of the sex trafficking movement charges that we have there. And then in terms of the rack tearing charges, again, we had other individuals who were helping groom women and who were involved in other crimes for Keith Raniere, including covering up different pieces of it.

So that was the coercion that you see in terms of the sex trafficking movement charges that we have there. And then in terms of the rack tearing charges, again, we had other individuals who were helping groom women and who were involved in other crimes for Keith Raniere, including covering up different pieces of it.

In terms of showing that the victims were under the coercive control of the defendant, again, there were a lot of similarities. So the women in my case were controlled in every aspect of their life. And their whole lives had really become this person, this organization. Their careers, they were really separated from people who could really serve as sounding boards for what was going on.

In terms of showing that the victims were under the coercive control of the defendant, again, there were a lot of similarities. So the women in my case were controlled in every aspect of their life. And their whole lives had really become this person, this organization. Their careers, they were really separated from people who could really serve as sounding boards for what was going on.

In terms of showing that the victims were under the coercive control of the defendant, again, there were a lot of similarities. So the women in my case were controlled in every aspect of their life. And their whole lives had really become this person, this organization. Their careers, they were really separated from people who could really serve as sounding boards for what was going on.

One difference that we do have is the level of alleged physical violence in the Sean Combs case. In the Naxiom case, there was a little bit of that. And of course, the sex crimes themselves are inherently violent. But this sort of brutal physical violence is something that we didn't have in my case, but that you do have in this case and that I think is very powerful evidence for the prosecutors.

One difference that we do have is the level of alleged physical violence in the Sean Combs case. In the Naxiom case, there was a little bit of that. And of course, the sex crimes themselves are inherently violent. But this sort of brutal physical violence is something that we didn't have in my case, but that you do have in this case and that I think is very powerful evidence for the prosecutors.

One difference that we do have is the level of alleged physical violence in the Sean Combs case. In the Naxiom case, there was a little bit of that. And of course, the sex crimes themselves are inherently violent. But this sort of brutal physical violence is something that we didn't have in my case, but that you do have in this case and that I think is very powerful evidence for the prosecutors.

Mark and Tenny were the team in the NXIVM case, so I know them well. Ms. Garagos did not have as much of a stand-up role during the NXIVM trial. I certainly think she's a talented lawyer. And I do think optically it was...

Mark and Tenny were the team in the NXIVM case, so I know them well. Ms. Garagos did not have as much of a stand-up role during the NXIVM trial. I certainly think she's a talented lawyer. And I do think optically it was...

Mark and Tenny were the team in the NXIVM case, so I know them well. Ms. Garagos did not have as much of a stand-up role during the NXIVM trial. I certainly think she's a talented lawyer. And I do think optically it was...

a good decision on the part of the defense team to have a young woman who was a contemporary of the prosecution team standing up and showing that she was on the defendant's side and advocating for the defendant. So I think to Mark and Tenny's credit, um, I don't think they're necessarily following the same playbook that I saw in their defense of Keith Raniere.

a good decision on the part of the defense team to have a young woman who was a contemporary of the prosecution team standing up and showing that she was on the defendant's side and advocating for the defendant. So I think to Mark and Tenny's credit, um, I don't think they're necessarily following the same playbook that I saw in their defense of Keith Raniere.

a good decision on the part of the defense team to have a young woman who was a contemporary of the prosecution team standing up and showing that she was on the defendant's side and advocating for the defendant. So I think to Mark and Tenny's credit, um, I don't think they're necessarily following the same playbook that I saw in their defense of Keith Raniere.

And I think that reflects, you know, probably their own evolution in how to defend these cases. But also I think likely, I think Mr. Combs is maybe more willing to allow them to take certain approaches like, you know, accepting responsibility for being a bad boyfriend for domestic abuse.

And I think that reflects, you know, probably their own evolution in how to defend these cases. But also I think likely, I think Mr. Combs is maybe more willing to allow them to take certain approaches like, you know, accepting responsibility for being a bad boyfriend for domestic abuse.

And I think that reflects, you know, probably their own evolution in how to defend these cases. But also I think likely, I think Mr. Combs is maybe more willing to allow them to take certain approaches like, you know, accepting responsibility for being a bad boyfriend for domestic abuse.

So I think right now, where I think we're going to see closing arguments go is really a bookend of what we saw in opening. I think we're going to see the defense say, We've heard a lot of stuff you might not like, jury, but it's not the crimes that the government has charged.

So I think right now, where I think we're going to see closing arguments go is really a bookend of what we saw in opening. I think we're going to see the defense say, We've heard a lot of stuff you might not like, jury, but it's not the crimes that the government has charged.

So I think right now, where I think we're going to see closing arguments go is really a bookend of what we saw in opening. I think we're going to see the defense say, We've heard a lot of stuff you might not like, jury, but it's not the crimes that the government has charged.