Namik

We've rebuilt a system where you're like, this is how much it costs based on everyone else.

Denominated in tokens and mega tokens, and you create structural economics and benefits, anyone who's choosing to hold the token.

So we just think it's a bit more of an honest approach.

Again, we'll let's see what happens.

Yeah, I mean, I think that like our general opinion is like, hey, let's look at the EVM and say end to end, where are there problems that we can rebuild from first principles?

So Yilong and Lei did that, or at least they tried to with Magif, right, as a blockchain.

and they've built an unbelievably high-performing blockchain, right?

What we're doing as Mega, as we move forward, is continue to make MegaEve really good, but then also try and identify additional bottlenecks within the EVM or just the general, like, how we understand blockchains to be today and try to build first-party applications to solve for those problems, right?

So, you know, I think we're really interested in, like,

a lot of that design space.

A lot of it is to be announced over the following months.

But yeah, I think our general opinion is we've built this great blockchain, we've facilitated applications on this chain, and we're going to continue to facilitate applications on this chain.

It's been two years.

We have a few apps that we think will be exciting.

There's been a lot of drama about apps on MegaEve.

And there'll be lots of drama in the future about apps on MegaEve, right?

Like we will not stop trying to have cool applications on the chain.

And we're not going to stop trying to work with those applications on doing something that's unique.

And anytime we progress into building first party applications or first party experiences, we think it's because it's net positive for MegaEth and MegaEth token holders as a general group.

Yeah.