Namik

He says he would build a bunch of stuff which is not similar to Ethereum L1.

He mentioned six things.

We do 50% of them off the bat.

We scale...

Buzzword, but it is a word.

We scaled far, far further than what any L1 can scale in our opinion.

Right.

So we did a stress test on mainnet.

So everyone was able to do it where we did 55,000 transactions per second.

That was a mixture of Unity free transfers as well as ERC transfers.

And while that was happening, we were allowing users to play low latency games at Crossy Fluffle with zero UX tradeoffs.

Now, this is only possible because we've chosen to build a layer two.

So that's one of the things we do, which Vitalik had described.

We've also built an ultra low latency environment, something that really can't be done with a traditional consensus based layer one system.

And we decided to do a bunch of unique, wacky things on the chain, which we did because applications wanted us to.

That's an example is our native enshrined Oracle chain link.

So when I saw the article slash tweet, I was happy because a strong ETH is good for crypto.

I think if ETH doesn't do well, our entire industry, i.e.

smart contract blockchains, we're all screwed.

And I was kind of happy because it almost meant we can drop some of the traditional alignment games.