Nat Towsen

Of course.

Congressman, we're really excited to talk to you today.

And we want to talk initially about the we're currently pertaining to Iran.

I think it's what's on people's minds right now.

So I'm going to want to start with that.

And we are well past the May 1st deadline for the War Powers Resolution.

And I actually want to ask, Chad, did you want to jump in and ask a more specific question about that?

Because that's where I'd like to start the discussion today.

Yeah, I was curious because vote on a 2023 bill about sanctions in Iran and limiting the president's power to add or remove sanctions.

And you voted against that.

I'm curious if you could talk about the motivation behind that vote and whether you regret it or whether you feel how you feel it factors into the current crisis.

Yes, I'm curious how you feel that it connects.

I actually want to kick it over to Mr. Global for a second and talk to you a little bit about the energy sector.

Matt, is there a question that you'd like to lead with here?

I have a few thoughts myself.

That's a pretty popular conclusion on this podcast as well, just so you know.

It did work with enormous environmental costs, too, I feel like we should point out.

That wasn't sustainable at all, ever.

But it worked economically, you're saying.

It's true that we didn't know about carbon emissions as much in 1890 as we do now, I guess.