Natalie (Natali Morris)

speaker

1,117 appearances 3 recordings 1 series first heard Jul 2026 last heard 5 Aug

Natalie (Natali Morris)’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 3 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 2.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

Redacted News · AI will end government as we know it and it will start with the books | Redacted · 4 Aug 2026 podcast

what books you know they no longer have them and that's the reason why they're essentially engaging in uh digital book burning and physical book burning because they're not they don't want us to discover what it is they were doing and is there anybody smart enough who works in the government to say no no we see that book in your metadata or you can just hide like can you this is a silly question but like can you hide it in the machines learning

Right.

Or masterminds.

And if you look at some of the titles of the authors that brought this suit, it brings up anxiety of the type of knowledge we might not be able to have.

So I just highlighted the books of the authors that were the plaintiffs.

And they tend to be anti-war books, books about medical corruption, books about alternative medicines.

So obviously that says to me that there are stories that could possibly be buried forever.

And that's my anxiety.

What do you think of that?

Yeah.

So, okay.

You bring up an interesting point.

I had not thought of it this way because I thought if you're going to read a book about say ivermectin, which we were not allowed to know was a curative for COVID during the pandemic and

then you could either tell the algorithm or the AI bot, read this, but down rank it as false because I want you to, or you could withhold it.

And so I hadn't thought about that because I just wondered if it's gonna read wrong think, how are you gonna teach it that it's wrong think?

Because eventually the machine

may be able to understand the breadth of knowledge, of human knowledge, and actually rank things that humans don't want us to know.

You're saying that it would be selectively censored, which I didn't think of.

Maybe I should have.

Okay, so now we're getting existential because it seems as if the machine wants to understand things in a broad sense and that it's the same people who are trying to edit what we know as humans who would be trying to edit what the machine knows.

Showing 521–540 of 1,117 · page 27 of 56