Neal Freiman

I love it.

I love it.

I love it.

I'd probably need to call up a professional because those two together, oh my God, it would be a disaster. Okay, let's sprint to the finish with some final headlines. The hits keep coming to President Trump's big, beautiful bill.

I'd probably need to call up a professional because those two together, oh my God, it would be a disaster. Okay, let's sprint to the finish with some final headlines. The hits keep coming to President Trump's big, beautiful bill.

I'd probably need to call up a professional because those two together, oh my God, it would be a disaster. Okay, let's sprint to the finish with some final headlines. The hits keep coming to President Trump's big, beautiful bill.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office calculated that the massive tax cuts and spending package would add $2.4 trillion to US debt by 2034, giving more ammo to critics like Elon Musk, who say the bill would bankrupt the country for future generations.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office calculated that the massive tax cuts and spending package would add $2.4 trillion to US debt by 2034, giving more ammo to critics like Elon Musk, who say the bill would bankrupt the country for future generations.

The nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office calculated that the massive tax cuts and spending package would add $2.4 trillion to US debt by 2034, giving more ammo to critics like Elon Musk, who say the bill would bankrupt the country for future generations.

Specifically, the bean counters at the CBO found that the bill would cut spending by $1.3 trillion in the coming decade, but reduce tax revenues far more than that $3.75 trillion. It would also cause the number of people without health insurance to rise by $10.9 million from cuts to Medicaid.

Specifically, the bean counters at the CBO found that the bill would cut spending by $1.3 trillion in the coming decade, but reduce tax revenues far more than that $3.75 trillion. It would also cause the number of people without health insurance to rise by $10.9 million from cuts to Medicaid.

Specifically, the bean counters at the CBO found that the bill would cut spending by $1.3 trillion in the coming decade, but reduce tax revenues far more than that $3.75 trillion. It would also cause the number of people without health insurance to rise by $10.9 million from cuts to Medicaid.

The new figures may dim the bill's chances in the Senate where it can't lose many Republican votes, but some GOP lawmakers already say they're voting against it, with Senator Ron Johnson yesterday calling the bill immoral and grotesque and demanding changes. Yeah, the Trump administration Thank you very much.

The new figures may dim the bill's chances in the Senate where it can't lose many Republican votes, but some GOP lawmakers already say they're voting against it, with Senator Ron Johnson yesterday calling the bill immoral and grotesque and demanding changes. Yeah, the Trump administration Thank you very much.

The new figures may dim the bill's chances in the Senate where it can't lose many Republican votes, but some GOP lawmakers already say they're voting against it, with Senator Ron Johnson yesterday calling the bill immoral and grotesque and demanding changes. Yeah, the Trump administration Thank you very much.

This is a little different than the last time they did this. Seems like they have their legal ducks a little more in order. Trump, one week into office, ordered this travel ban from majority Muslim countries. And it was, remember, it was chaos at the airports. No one knew what was going on because it was implemented so hastily. That went through years of litigation.

This is a little different than the last time they did this. Seems like they have their legal ducks a little more in order. Trump, one week into office, ordered this travel ban from majority Muslim countries. And it was, remember, it was chaos at the airports. No one knew what was going on because it was implemented so hastily. That went through years of litigation.

This is a little different than the last time they did this. Seems like they have their legal ducks a little more in order. Trump, one week into office, ordered this travel ban from majority Muslim countries. And it was, remember, it was chaos at the airports. No one knew what was going on because it was implemented so hastily. That went through years of litigation.

The Supreme Court upheld the legality once the Trump administration provided legislation. justification for it looks like they taking their time and getting their legal ducks in a row so that it will survive more legal challenges here of course human rights advocates are still upset about this specially from places like Sudan which is engulfed in a civil

The Supreme Court upheld the legality once the Trump administration provided legislation. justification for it looks like they taking their time and getting their legal ducks in a row so that it will survive more legal challenges here of course human rights advocates are still upset about this specially from places like Sudan which is engulfed in a civil