Pablo Torre

And the red alert returns at 9.06 and 26 seconds.

Now headed courtside.

Appendix Q gives us the picture of that.

9.07 and 33 seconds.

Security officer walks over to section one and row one and speaks with guest.

And then at 9.08 and seven seconds, at last, Nina and female guest take a seat at section one and row one.

Appendix T providing the proof and scene.

And so your security sources, when it comes to the people who are not involved again in the filing of the civil suit, but spoke to some of the allegations involved,

What do they say about the Garden wanting just this granular, literally second-by-second level of surveillance?

The lawsuit, which is, again, filed by this former MSG security staffer, it alleges that the guard and security boss believed that Nina's, quote, presence as an openly transgender woman could, quote, damage MSG's reputation, end quote.

We should say that Wired did send a detailed list of questions to Madison Square Garden about your reporting, about James Dolan, about his chief of security, who we will absolutely get to in a bit here.

And you gave them a long time to respond.

And how many of your specific questions did they ultimately answer?

And what did they write back, if anything?

We sent our own request for comment here at Pablo Torre Finds Out to MSG.

They referred to the same statement.

It is interesting.

In its own court filing in the civil case that the garden does acknowledge the monitoring of this woman, quote, as being described in excessive needless detail to garner attention for his, being the litigant's lawsuit, end quote.

But it does not deny the surveillance.

which is, again, hard to, I suppose, refute based on what we're holding in our hands.