Paris Lilly

And I would like to see that where you treat the character like the characters themselves stay faithful to what we've seen over the years.

Right.

But I do think you can kind of tell a new origin story with them through the movies.

to kind of bring everyone together.

So it, it makes sense in that way.

Cause obviously they've retold the, the Zelda story over the past 30 plus years.

So do it with the movie too.

Again, you're the, the faithfuls like me, we get, we know the assignment, we get it.

And you're kind of establishing a new cannon for new people that are being introduced to Zelda, you know, through the movies as well.

Now I would piggyback off of that and say, I don't need whatever come, whatever game comes after the movie, right?

to stay faithful to the canon of what they do in the movies i don't need that i think i think a great example of where you needed to do it was the witcher like we obviously saw the netflix series where they skewed so far out of the canon of what the witcher was in the books and held even the game that that turned fans off but zelda has never really been that way so i i think it's okay

And I guess it again depends on the story that they're going to tell and what they do with Gannon.

Do they defeat Gannon by the end of the first movie?

Or is it just a thing of they stop whatever conflict or invasion or whatever Gannon's doing?

But Gannon is still out there, I think.

For me, you got to keep Ganon as as the antagonist throughout the sequel.

I assume they were probably your trilogy or something like that.

And then by the end of it, that's when Link and Zelda actually defeat Ganon once and for all.

So, yeah, it's tough to say until we get a kind of premise of what the story is going to be about this.

But I would just have it that you use the first movie to establish the characters, establish Hyrule, establish the world.