Paul Kent

And I am there.

And in the presumption of innocence, absolutely.

But I think the NRL need to get involved in support of him.

And if he is as innocent as they claim, they need to come out and they say, okay, we have redacted certain parts of our findings, but this is what we found.

And they need to give the whole lot over.

Not part of it.

I was reading this the other day, okay?

This is only three weeks ago.

Roy Masters interviewed, wrote a story about entertainment, which is one of the things that shoots me, that we now build this game as just entertainment.

It's a sport.

And at the issue, at the heart of every sport is its integrity.

And this idea that we are changing rules and bending rules and changing situations all for the good of entertainment erodes what the sport is about to me.

And, yeah, we can't turn rugby league into rock and roll wrestling where outcomes are decided for because it's the most popular one for the fans.

You feel that we're being taken on a ride here.

Trust me.

Trust me.

Try being a Warriors fan over the weekend.

Okay?

But anyway, let me just read this out to you.

So Roy Masters took it to the NRL about that, and he's got concerns about a lot of the six-again's and things like that, which have made the game more entertaining, but have been unable to come under anywhere near as much scrutiny as probably what they should be because by the time the referee's made his decision, we've all moved on and something else has happened and we're all looking at that and there's no scrutiny over, hang on, what was that for?