Peter Suderman

speaker

62 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Dec 2024 last heard Dec 2024

Peter Suderman’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

No recordings in the last 12 months.Older appearances are listed below; set an alert to hear about the next one.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

The Bulwark Daily · 'The Hottest Circle of Hell Is for Those Who Stay Neutral' · 27 Dec 2024 podcast

Would the presidential election have happened in your best life?

Okay, I think we've got a bunch of exactlys here and a long, long line of people who want to ask questions.

Ooh. Next question. Do we have one for the bulwark here?

I'm so glad we got a zoning question because that's the thing that actually is for the win. Let's zoning. Everybody clap for zoning. Huge applause. All right. We've got time for a couple more questions here. Let's let's move along.

If lots of people decide not to vote, is that choosing a side? I mean, is that maybe choosing to not choose a side? And what are the implications of that?

Next question.

We care a lot.

Yes. We can talk about free trade. We're going to do that on our podcast and in Reason Magazine. We have time for one more very quick question. Unfortunately, just one more. We are on a clock.

Okay. So thank you all for those excellent questions. I apologize to the people who did not get to ask questions, but all of our debaters will be at the bar afterwards. There is an after party. So now we are going to move into our final segment before we get to that party, before the drinking really starts. And this is just going to be closing statements.

Each side, each person, excuse me, will have two minutes to make a final case. And we are going to start with reason. Is that Matt Welch going to? Yeah, Matt Welch is going to start.

Tim, closing remarks?

Sarah Longwell. Take us home.

All right. So this is now the moment in this debate when you, the audience, have to pick a side again. So you're going to vote a second time. And remember, the winner of the debate will not be the team that has the most support or the least support. But instead, it will be the team that moved the most people towards their position. And so please get out your phones.

We can take this up at the bar. It's time for you all to vote. So get out your phones and vote. The instructions, I hope, are on the screen behind me. I think it's just a text message. While you're voting, I just want to say... Thank you so much for coming to this very first edition of Reason Versus. You guys were great.

Also, thank you so much to the Bulwark and to Tim Miller and Sarah Longwell, also to Nick Gillespie and Matt Welch, my friends and colleagues who came down from New York for this. To the Arthur N. Roop Foundation, which provided support for Reason for this series. Okay, let's find out what the results for the initial vote were.

Right, so we had 30% for the resolution you don't have to pick a side in politics, 45% for you do, and 25% undecided.

And now, now we're going to find out what happened after the debate with a second vote.

I am gonna be... When we find out, we're gonna give a prize here. And that prize is gonna be delivered by the one and only Andrew Heaton. So we're gonna bring him out.

The whole point was to increase the drama here.

And the bulwark is the winner, moving 21% of the audience towards their side. You guys win? What do you win, Andrew Heaton?

Showing 41–60 of 62 · page 3 of 4