Phil Robertson

Go ahead.

I mean, I think that if you go back to the Hebrews and think about that's such a good picture of it that.

The case the Hebrew writer's making on competence is he's actually setting up profound insecurity at first.

He's like, let me walk you through the way that things currently set up, at least in your mind, to someone who is under Judaism.

And

It's a systematic argument that shows the weakness of the entire system in that it's only – the only thing that it can actually do for you is to highlight how sinful you are.

But the Hebrew writer goes on to say that it's impossible –

Impossible for the blood of goats and bulls to take away sins.

It can't happen.

It's an annual reminder of your sin, but it's impossible for it to actually take away your sin.

And if you just run the logic out, you're like, yeah, that sounds kind of stupid that I could sacrifice...

some animal and that's going to pay for what I've done?

Of course not.

And so it builds that out.

It builds up things like, oh, let's talk about your priest, by the way.

You know, the priest that goes and offers atonement for you?

Well, he's got his own issues.

He's got to go make atonement for his sins before he can even make atonement for your sins.

And he's got to do it every single year on Yom Kippur.

And it just goes down the whole thing of this argument of how