R. Brent Wisner, Esq

speaker
642 appearances 1 recordings 1 series first heard Feb 2026 last heard 17 Feb

R. Brent Wisner, Esq’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months
1 · Feb OctJan 26AprJulnow

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 1 in all, peaking in Feb 2026 with 1.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment
And there's no way Trump gets into the White House without that.
It's the issue of whether or not you can sue Monsanto for failing to warn.
The idea, it's called preemptions, federal preemption.
And the idea is if the EPA doesn't require a warning,
then no state can require a warning.
That's the argument put forward by Monsanto, that the EPA sets the floor and the ceiling of what is permissible to be said about a pesticide.
So for example, if the EPA doesn't say anything about warning about cancer, then pesticide manufacturers are not allowed to warn about cancer.
That's the argument.
There's a split here, okay?
Multiple courts of appeal out of the 11th Circuit, which is in the southern Florida area, and the 9th Circuit, which is out of California, have agreed that it's not preempted.
So there's actually very strong case law supporting that it's not a valid argument.
There's one decision out of the 3rd Circuit out of Philadelphia that actually found that it was preempted under certain circumstances.
And so with that framework, the Supreme Court is taking the issue and they're going to make a ruling about whether or not that's the case.
If they rule in Monsanto's favor, it's the silver bullet.
Every lawsuit against Monsanto ends related to glyphosate.
They suffer.
They get nothing.
They get no money, no compensation, no settlement, no right to sue.
They just get poisoned and there's nothing they can do about it.
fascinating issue there.
Showing 421–440 of 642 · page 22 of 33 ← Previous Next →