Rachel Abrams

Wait, just so I understand. So you guys are actively considering losing some functionality of the university in order not to have to capitulate to the government. That's something that you're looking at?

You know, like getting rid of that's what I was trying to get at. Like, are you basically looking at different departments or different like areas of the university that you would have to cut in order if this were to go on longer than a year or two?

You know, like getting rid of that's what I was trying to get at. Like, are you basically looking at different departments or different like areas of the university that you would have to cut in order if this were to go on longer than a year or two?

Again, just like thinking as a layperson here listening to you, I guess my main burning question is like, are people at Princeton at your level saying, you know, maybe Princeton has to recede from being a leader in scientific research?

Again, just like thinking as a layperson here listening to you, I guess my main burning question is like, are people at Princeton at your level saying, you know, maybe Princeton has to recede from being a leader in scientific research?

I just want to point out, it sounds like you are saying you guys are doing your modeling, you're doing your research, you're looking at your resources, and things will be fine. You are going to figure out a way to adapt to this environment and continue doing the work that the university is doing without capitulating in the ways that you have perhaps seen from your peers.

I just want to point out, it sounds like you are saying you guys are doing your modeling, you're doing your research, you're looking at your resources, and things will be fine. You are going to figure out a way to adapt to this environment and continue doing the work that the university is doing without capitulating in the ways that you have perhaps seen from your peers.

And that you can also probably adapt without giving up on research entirely. There might be new areas you can't go into, but you will remain a research institution on the forefront of research. I guess what I'm saying is, on the one hand, I hear you saying it's a crisis. On the other hand, I hear you saying it's going to be fine. And I'm kind of just wondering sort of which is it.

And that you can also probably adapt without giving up on research entirely. There might be new areas you can't go into, but you will remain a research institution on the forefront of research. I guess what I'm saying is, on the one hand, I hear you saying it's a crisis. On the other hand, I hear you saying it's going to be fine. And I'm kind of just wondering sort of which is it.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you.

Thank you. Thank you.

From The New York Times, I'm Rachel Abrams. This is The Daily. In a history-making day of tariffs against dozens of countries, President Trump ended one era of global trade and began a new one. Today, my colleague Anna Swanson on how the world's economy is being upended and who will be affected most. It's Thursday, April 3rd. Hi, Anna. Hey, how are you? I'm good.

From The New York Times, I'm Rachel Abrams. This is The Daily. In a history-making day of tariffs against dozens of countries, President Trump ended one era of global trade and began a new one. Today, my colleague Anna Swanson on how the world's economy is being upended and who will be affected most. It's Thursday, April 3rd. Hi, Anna. Hey, how are you? I'm good.

I'm really curious what your day has been like.

I'm really curious what your day has been like.

So, Ana, obviously today has been incredibly busy, but really the news on the tariffs over the last few months has been totally head spinning and frankly kind of hard to follow. And we're speaking to you shortly after President Trump has come out to the Rose Garden and announced this expansive new plan. We all watched it here at The Daily, and there's a lot to get into.