Rachel Sharp

speaker

2,365 appearances 16 recordings 2 series first heard Jan 2026 last heard 9 Sep

Rachel Sharp’s voice in public audio — every appearance, attributed to the second.

Trend

recordings per month · last 12 months

Recordings per month over the last 12 months — 16 in all, peaking in Aug 2026 with 7.

Appearances

newest first · ▶ plays the moment

The Trial: USA · The Trial of Lindsay Clancy - Your Questions Answered · 9 Sep 2026 podcast

if they think she did not commit the crime. matched

It's unlikely because she obviously has admitted that she did kill the children, but it's possible that they could have still done that if they felt that the prosecution's case was so weak that they didn't prove beyond reasonable doubt that she even committed the crime of killing the children. matched

That is a very good question. matched

I mean, Kevin Reddit obviously called for Judge Sullivan to remove that juror, or at the very least, to question that juror to get a better sense of what exactly was going on. matched

The four person had sent a note, we now know not once, but twice, saying that the juror was expressing doubt. matched

but was not willing to apply that reasonable doubt to the law. matched

And the judge did bring each juror up one by one and questioned them individually. matched

and then give them additional instruction that they need to follow the law to reasonable doubt. matched

To Kevin Reddington that was not enough. matched

He said that more needed to be done, that he needed to question them more. matched

And that that juror is not withholding their oath, then they need to be struck. matched

The judge said that he felt he'd done enough and was not going to do that. matched

It's a very interesting question, and I think one that I think a lot of people still have as to whether was that the right move from the judge? matched

Should he have at least given that more thorough questioning to get to the bottom of it? matched

I think it's important to say that removing matched

Moving a juror, especially removing a holdout juror, is a very significant thing to do. matched

And that's a very big thing to do. matched

That's not something a judge could take lightly because that could open up all different avenues of is that juror just getting removed because they disagree with the majority? matched

And that's not the way the law works. matched

However, if that juror was not living up to their oath, that's a different matter. matched

Showing 21–40 of 2,365 · page 2 of 119