Rand Paul

Most people were in favor of getting rid of those people.

But we solved at least half of them today, right?

We think he needs to come in one more time, and I have asked him to come in voluntarily for testimony.

We're negotiating with his attorneys.

If he comes in voluntarily, we can get him to testify.

If he resists, I have subpoena power, but it would probably require a court case to get him to come in.

But I think he needs to fully explain why this wasn't gain-of-function and why he was destroying federal records.

Emails back and forth saying destroy this after you've read it.

That's illegal and we have evidence of that.

No, somebody else did.

And I wanted my wife to do it because she's a great reader and she helped me write the book.

But no, but my wife and I wrote it together.

This is our second book together.

We wrote The Case Against Socialism a few years ago.

And then she and I collaborated.

And I jokingly say the boring, dry, scientific part is mine.

If there's anything really interesting to read, that's my wife.

Bombing's not the answer.

Plus there is this sticking point of the Constitution that we don't really let presidents bomb countries just when they feel like it.

They're supposed to ask the people...