Rep. Eric Burlison

I'm proud to say that I'm next to the person we spoke with.

I knew more than everybody else in the room.

So at least I was able to keep up more than others were.

Can I ask you this?

So the tone that I got was that from the knowledge of the people that are working there today, that they had no knowledge or awareness of any UAP non-human intelligence material or aspects.

um which you know look there's lots of turnover it could it it could be historical we could have which is why a lot of times what we're hearing is people that that have retired from the military or retired from intelligence and coming forward um but yeah currently active on that site the people that i spoke with adamantly denied in anything related to non-human intelligence

I think the $10 million doesn't scratch the surface, Jeremy.

I don't remember the exact number, but I think the facility was a lot more than $10 million.

I'll say this.

I think the hangar doors probably cost $10 million.

No, I do not.

Based on the information that I've been given from David Grush and others that had some insights there.

So you really believe that they don't know?

I really don't think that they would lie to a member of Congress, and I don't think that they gave me a dog and pony show.

What I make up, Jeremy, is that – and what I was able to ascertain is that there is a facility that had a purpose.

It serves a great purpose today, and it's a necessary facility today.

I think it had a broader purpose than the UAP topic, but it would be a perfect location if you were to do reverse engineering of a UAP.

It would be the perfect location to do something like that.

So that's a great question.

I do think it needs to have an executive order.