Rich Lowry

And these are cases that are going to come up to him in his court. So what if he, you know, this didn't happen, Trump didn't take the debate, but what happens if Trump hits back at the chief justice, right? And you get a war between the president, a war of words between the president and the chief justice. You speak, if you're a justice of the court, you should.

And these are cases that are going to come up to him in his court. So what if he, you know, this didn't happen, Trump didn't take the debate, but what happens if Trump hits back at the chief justice, right? And you get a war between the president, a war of words between the president and the chief justice. You speak, if you're a justice of the court, you should.

And these are cases that are going to come up to him in his court. So what if he, you know, this didn't happen, Trump didn't take the debate, but what happens if Trump hits back at the chief justice, right? And you get a war between the president, a war of words between the president and the chief justice. You speak, if you're a justice of the court, you should.

You know, they do book tours and whatnot, but you should speak largely through your opinions, your well-considered opinions. When you've considered everything carefully, it's come up to you appropriately, and it's something in your ambit. That's your role. So this was, at the very least, imprudent from the chief justice.

You know, they do book tours and whatnot, but you should speak largely through your opinions, your well-considered opinions. When you've considered everything carefully, it's come up to you appropriately, and it's something in your ambit. That's your role. So this was, at the very least, imprudent from the chief justice.

You know, they do book tours and whatnot, but you should speak largely through your opinions, your well-considered opinions. When you've considered everything carefully, it's come up to you appropriately, and it's something in your ambit. That's your role. So this was, at the very least, imprudent from the chief justice.

Yeah, so first of all, I love this National Review Day, Charlie versus Megan. I love the throwdown we're having here. Look, I think Roberts is right on the merits. I don't think it'd be a good idea to just go and impeach judges for their opinions unless they're mentally ill or something or just not competent to carry out their duties or they're found in gold bars and they're

Yeah, so first of all, I love this National Review Day, Charlie versus Megan. I love the throwdown we're having here. Look, I think Roberts is right on the merits. I don't think it'd be a good idea to just go and impeach judges for their opinions unless they're mentally ill or something or just not competent to carry out their duties or they're found in gold bars and they're

Yeah, so first of all, I love this National Review Day, Charlie versus Megan. I love the throwdown we're having here. Look, I think Roberts is right on the merits. I don't think it'd be a good idea to just go and impeach judges for their opinions unless they're mentally ill or something or just not competent to carry out their duties or they're found in gold bars and they're

suit pockets the way Senator Menendez was. But I just don't think he should have said it. I don't think it helps the standing of the Supreme Court that he's so concerned with justifiably. But Senate confirms judges, right? That is part of our system. But we're not going to impeach these judges. There's never going to be the votes for it. So at the end of the day, this is a real sideshow.

suit pockets the way Senator Menendez was. But I just don't think he should have said it. I don't think it helps the standing of the Supreme Court that he's so concerned with justifiably. But Senate confirms judges, right? That is part of our system. But we're not going to impeach these judges. There's never going to be the votes for it. So at the end of the day, this is a real sideshow.

suit pockets the way Senator Menendez was. But I just don't think he should have said it. I don't think it helps the standing of the Supreme Court that he's so concerned with justifiably. But Senate confirms judges, right? That is part of our system. But we're not going to impeach these judges. There's never going to be the votes for it. So at the end of the day, this is a real sideshow.

Well, it's preposterous, but it's the political views you'd expect of this guy. At least it didn't use the word that some have used. to describe his dissension, which he's been taken hostage. I believe, if I'm not mistaken, that might have been his wife's statement that was read from the courthouse steps last week, which is just perverse from people who- But not read by his wife, interestingly.

Well, it's preposterous, but it's the political views you'd expect of this guy. At least it didn't use the word that some have used. to describe his dissension, which he's been taken hostage. I believe, if I'm not mistaken, that might have been his wife's statement that was read from the courthouse steps last week, which is just perverse from people who- But not read by his wife, interestingly.

Well, it's preposterous, but it's the political views you'd expect of this guy. At least it didn't use the word that some have used. to describe his dissension, which he's been taken hostage. I believe, if I'm not mistaken, that might have been his wife's statement that was read from the courthouse steps last week, which is just perverse from people who- But not read by his wife, interestingly.

What's that?

What's that?

What's that?

She read the wife's statement.

She read the wife's statement.