Rob Wiblin

where you say, well, we got to this one first, and then we looked at what happened the month after and the month before.

And then with the next one, we reached them a month later, after and before.

Normally, this just before and after comparison isn't completely persuasive, isn't super persuasive, because there could have been some broader trend, some other thing that happened around that same time that might have changed vaccination rates that wasn't you.

But if you have enough villages, if you have a large enough sample, then it's very likely that any such broader changes are cancelling out.

And you also get this diversification across different time periods where you release the program.

So

Simply kind of doing this before and after comparison.

Yeah, if you're large enough, could give you a very good measure of your impact.

Fantastic.

Okay.

Yeah.

What's another potential roadblock to achieving your full potential?

Yeah.

Is it likely that COVID is going to present kind of longer term challenges or is it more, it's hopefully a temporary thing for just a few years?

And actually, what was the main problem that COVID presented?

I guess you had to switch to remote work, but was it that people were unwilling to leave their house to go and get vaccinated?

So it wasn't clear what you were asking them to do?

So I guess to reach 10 to 100 times as many parents, you might need something like 10 to 100 times as much funding.

Do you think, you know, if we can hire the right people, if we can demonstrate that we're roughly having the effect that we were expecting to, that amount of funding is in theory available from foundations or different places that you can apply?

Or could that potentially just, could you eventually reach something where you're like, well, we've gotten as much money as we can from all of the funders who are interested in funding this kind of thing and now we're stuck?