Robbie Starbuck

It was my hope that Google would want to fix things and do the right thing.

Unfortunately, Google has chosen a different path.

But, you know, this happened independently of that situation.

So it's a it's just wild.

You know, for the best I can tell, the initial issue started with Google.

Section 230 has no application here at all.

I'd be surprised if they tried to apply it because they are the publisher of the content.

And frankly, they probably don't want anything remotely capable of piercing the veil of Section 230.

I do think there probably has to be an update, you know, in general.

I think you've got to have broad ability to allow people to speak freely online.

But beyond that, you know, you have to have lines in the sand on malice and especially content that they're publishing through these AI chatbots.

But yeah, you know, the absurdity of the hallucination defense is the fact that there's not anything that's like Robbie loves to save puppies, right?

That's not in the bio on me.

It's not some, you know, some wonderful, there's no flowery happy lies in there, right?

It's all negative stuff.

It's all like, you know, he was on drugs, sold drugs, shot somebody, groomed actresses.

That was another one that was like mind blowing to me.

um and so it it's very clear there's this like absolute negative tilt to it that even just that on its own you know throwing out the fact that it's consistent all the time

It just like, I don't know how you get to the place where you could try to pretend it's a hallucination.

I think you'd have to be a non-technically savvy person to buy the excuses to hallucination.