Robert F. Kennedy Jr. (RFK III / Bobby Kennedy)

you know, rats and et cetera, and catalog them into a database and basically share that database with countries around the world in a way that on the face of it, at least in say China's case, it doesn't really make much sense.

So,

I was attempting to... Well, hang on a second.

20 i think it was 20 000 viruses to the wuhan lab but we didn't get a copy of them ourselves which kind of seems like a strange thing that does seem strange the us to do um you know we also taught the same lab the ralph barracks nocm technique which isn't useful at all unless you're trying to hide essentially a bioweapon

Right.

So that's kind of the questions I'm trying to raise is if you get two steps deep in this story, none of what they're saying makes any sense.

You know, I don't think there's really any argument for gain of function research.

It seems to me to, you know, it's just a it's a bioweapon factory.

I think that's kind of been proven.

There really isn't any useful purpose to that research.

And, you know, I'd love to debate anybody on that because.

it doesn't pass mustard.

Essentially, the infrastructure, the virus infrastructure, you got massive elements of the US military, but USAID,

you know, and Fauci's department, the NIAID, NIH.

But basically what happened was, you know, we outlawed biological weapons research.

It immediately got spun into, you know, sort of this predictive modeling thing where they attempt to predict what viruses will come out by going and gathering them all, which, okay, like maybe it makes sense to have a

bunch of these viruses, but are the chances of something happening, does that outweigh the risk there?

And I'd say, you know, then you have something like the diffuse proposal, which very closely mimics what was happening in the Wuhan lab leak.

And, you know, right there you have them experimenting with bat-worn coronaviruses that

and attaching spike proteins there in humanized mice, that's a chimeric virus.