Rory O'Driscoll

But if I had to pick, I would bet on that rapidity today.

It could be.

I think the only reason Cursor didn't build replet or lovable is it wasn't worth their time because they're in an even bigger, better market for the moment.

I honestly think it was just a distraction.

As big as that market is, it's exciting that those guys together will go to almost 500 million in a year.

Cursor got there in nine months.

So you're taking your eye off the ball to invest in a high churn,

frictionful space when they probably have 160% effective NRR at a revenue level because nobody leaves cursor, right?

Why would you invest in a smaller high churn space when you have insane retention and you're growing even faster?

It's just, you'd have to, and you want to have a team of in triple digit number of employees.

You hope the other categories are just behind in a sense, right?

But maybe it's intrinsic to the extreme value in a very large category of software.

So I think the overall growth is the key question.

Could I just go back to one point on Cursor versus Figma?

Because I do think it's so important to founders and investors.

I think one risk is that Cursor completely displaced Figma.

We don't need it.

That's unlikely for a lot of reasons.

I think the bigger risk for so many vendors is that it maims Figma.

What does that mean, Jason?