Ryan Alford

Talk to me, man.

Instructure.

What that word means.

I did recognize that in our notes.

And that name, I was twitching a little bit.

I'm not sure.

Yes.

Yes.

That's your point of view, I guess.

It's probably how literate they were with technology.

There's some meta talk there, Ryan, the meta of the fact that the teachers weren't prepared to use the software appropriately.

And we're talking about how workers in general feel unprepared.

If we're going to learn something for the sake of learning and for teaching ourselves how to problem solve, are these the problems that we should be solving?

Do we need to learn calculus?

Do we need to learn things that AI can do and will perceivably be around unless we all go back to the old ages because power goes away or something or Wi-Fi goes away?

Are we really teaching what we should be teaching and why do we still need to learn the things we learned 30 years ago?

Even things as simple as math is direct in black and white.

When I think of what you just described and I agree with it, I tell people there still will be jobs because of what you said and discernment and humanity that have to be overlaid on the top of these things is not only just that, as long with certain factual applications in the real world.

But when doing 10 plus 10 or A squared plus B squared plus C equals C squared, even at advanced levels, that's fairly black and white.

Are you saying that math is done wrong by Jets GBT?