Sagar

Who have a shit ton to gain from some more defense spending at some very dubious and problematic expense.

So I don't even see a political constituency which is capable of solving this question, like period, without a dramatic rewriting of the entire global foreign policy elite.

And it's terrifying, honestly, because

It's theoretical.

We're just talking about it.

But the realities of what this means in the future are going to be serious humiliations abroad, being at the genuine, really being at the mercy of other great powers.

Nobody alive in the United States today has ever lived under a regime like that.

We have not lived that way in almost 100 years.

And it's

I mean, look, you can read books.

It usually leads to clashes and fires and genocides and death and destruction.

It's not good.

And when I say this is the big one, you won't see it right now.

What you're going to see is the ground for when the next big one happens and people are like, holy shit.

It's like the Suez moment.

That's why – what happened with Suez, it was the – it happened after nearly a decade of the post-World War II era where the UK was generally declining in power and the empire was collapsing.

And everybody, including the UK, was like, oh my god, we have no power anymore.

But the signs were all there.

I mean what we're saying is that it's all right here.

Like it has been laid out.